arXiv Science⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2605.26045

Confidence and Calibration of Activation Oracles for Reliable Interpretation of Language Model Internals

Federico Torrielli·Peter Schneider-Kamp·Lukas Galke Poech
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

An activation oracle is a language model trained to read another model's internal activations and describe them in natural language, for example to name a secret word the other model was trained to hide. Oracle answers carry no measure of confidence, which limits their use in auditing. We compare five ways of attaching a confidence score to an oracle's answer on this secret-word task, across four oracles from two model families (Qwen and Gemma, 8B to 27B parameters), at $6{,}000$ samples per method and oracle. The five methods rank the same way on all four oracles. Which method to use depends on one question: can the auditor list the possible answers in advance? If the auditor can, then having the oracle score each candidate answer roughly doubles accuracy and separates correct from wrong answers best of the five (AUROC $0.92$ to $0.96$). If the oracle must generate its answer freely and no labeled data exists, the agreement rate over twenty samples is the only confidence that is calibrated on every oracle. Once labeled data exists, a rescaled answer probability reaches the same calibration at one generation instead of twenty. Asking the oracle to state a confidence number gives no usable signal on any oracle. Code and the patched trainer are available at https://github.com/federicotorrielli/probabilistic_activation_oracles.

Explore related subjects

cs.CLcs.AI

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Federico Torrielli, Peter Schneider-Kamp, Lukas Galke Poech. 2026-08-03. Confidence and Calibration of Activation Oracles for Reliable Interpretation of Language Model Internals. https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.26045

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Customized large language models can outperform Community Notes in correcting misinformation

Addressing misinformation in real-world settings is challenging: content is often multimodal; factuality judgments are nuanced and context-dependent; new events emerge rapidly across domains; corrections must be timely, trustworthy, and politically impartial; and multidimensional, multistakeholder frameworks remain lacking. Crowdsourced fact-checking systems such as Community Notes have gained broad adoption, but timely, scalable coverage remains difficult. We introduce MUSE, which augments large language models (LLMs) with trust-aware retrieval of up-to-date evidence and task-specific multimodal reasoning. Given a piece of content, MUSE identifies whether and which parts may be false or misleading and provides explanations grounded in credible references. We also develop an evaluation framework that assesses expert-rated response quality---including identification accuracy, explanation factuality, and the relevance and credibility of supporting references---as well as user perceptions. Across social media posts spanning modalities, domains, political leanings, misinformation tactics, and popularity, MUSE consistently produces high-quality responses, including for content not previously fact-checked online, and outperforms even highly rated Community Notes by 29%. It also improves participants' recognition of misinformation by 10%. Our work establishes a general methodological and evaluative framework for timely, scalable, and trustworthy correction of misinformation.

cs.CL↗
arXiv2026

The PIMMUR Principles: Ensuring Validity in Collective Behavior of LLM Societies

Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used to simulate human collective behavior, yet claims that such simulations are human-like remain largely untested. We conducted a systematic audit (pre-registered on OSF) of LLM-based social simulations across four databases (Scopus, IEEE Xplore, ACM Digital Library, and arXiv). Across 576 studies reported in 350 recent papers, we applied six methodological evaluations: agent Profile, Interaction, Memory, Minimal-Control, Unawareness, and Realism (PIMMUR). Coding every study against pre-specified rules, we revealed that PIM were met more often than MUR. Frontier LLMs correctly identified the underlying social experiment in 65.2% of cases, and 50.6% of prompts imposed constraints that pre-determined the outcome. These compliance rates are upper bounds, because incomplete methodological reporting (for example, unreleased prompts) limits the available evidence. Reproducing five representative experiments (e.g., opinion dynamics), we found that reported collective phenomena often vanish or reverse once PIMMUR principles are enforced, indicating that many "emergent" behaviors are methodological artifacts rather than genuine social dynamics. Current LLM simulations may therefore capture model-specific biases rather than universal features of human social behavior, raising concerns about their use as scientific proxies for human society.

cs.CL↗
arXiv2026

CHRONOBERG: Capturing Language Evolution and Temporal Awareness in Foundation Models

Large language models (LLMs) excel at operating at scale by leveraging social media and various data crawled from the web. Whereas existing corpora are diverse, their frequent lack of long-term temporal structure may however limit an LLM's ability to contextualize semantic and normative evolution of language and to capture diachronic variation. To support analysis and training for the latter, we introduce CHRONOBERG, a temporally structured corpus of English book texts spanning 250 years, curated from Project Gutenberg and enriched with a variety of temporal annotations. First, the edited nature of books enables us to quantify lexical semantic change through time-sensitive Valence-Arousal-Dominance (VAD) analysis and to construct historically calibrated affective lexicons to support temporally grounded interpretation. With the lexicons at hand, we demonstrate a need for modern LLM-based tools to better situate their detection of discriminatory language and contextualization of sentiment across various time-periods. In fact, we show how language models trained sequentially on CHRONOBERG struggle to encode diachronic shifts in meaning, emphasizing the need for temporally aware training and evaluation pipelines, and positioning CHRONOBERG as a scalable resource for the study of linguistic change and temporal generalization. Disclaimer: This paper includes language and display of samples that could be offensive to readers. Open Access: Chronoberg is available publicly on HuggingFace at ( https://huggingface.co/datasets/spaul25/Chronoberg). Code is available at (https://github.com/paulsubarna/Chronoberg).

cs.CL↗