arXiv · 2605.21135
Smarter edits? Post-editing with error highlights and translation suggestions
Abstract
As MT quality increases, interest in enhanced post-editing features such as QE-derived error highlights is growing, yet evidence for their usefulness remains limited. In this work, we explore the usefulness of LLM-derived error highlights and correction suggestions based on automatic post-editing (APE). We conduct a study where professional translators (En-Nl) post-edit translations using APE error highlights and correction suggestions and compare productivity, quality and user experience to regular PE and PE with QE-derived highlights. While no condition yielded productivity or quality gains compared to regular PE, APE highlights were better received than QE-derived highlights, and correction suggestions improved overall user experience.
Explore related subjects
Keep this discovery
Fleur V. J. van Tellingen, Gautam Ranka, Dora Žugčić, Joyce van der Wal, Andrea Camasta, Livio Guerra, Alina Karakanta. 2026-05-20. Smarter edits? Post-editing with error highlights and translation suggestions. https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.21135
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.