arXiv Science⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2605.02016

What's on Your Mind? Exploring Privacy of Mental Health Apps

Chloe Georgiou·Hans Lu·Emiliano De Cristofaro·Gene Tsudik
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Therapy and life-coaching apps have grown rapidly in number, variety, and popularity. At the same time, their users often share highly sensitive and personal information, including mental health issues, trauma experiences, fantasies, desires, and relationship difficulties. This prompts the need to examine privacy practices across the ecosystem. In this paper, we present a comprehensive analysis of a corpus of 25 popular Android mental health and life-coaching apps, such as Replika and Headspace. It builds on static analysis and dynamic network traffic analysis, coupled with identifying gaps between each app's observed behavior and its privacy policies. Our analysis highlights serious concerns and substantial transparency gaps. First, every app in our corpus embeds at least one tracker SDK not named in its privacy policy, and 85\% of the apps we instrument fail to disclose at least half of the trackers detected in their APKs. Second, more than half of the apps declare several dangerous permissions without corresponding privacy-policy disclosures, including camera or microphone permissions. Third, nearly half the apps disclose third-party AI processing (e.g., via OpenAI, Anthropic, and Groq) in their privacy policies, while several use only generic language (e.g., "AI services"), failing to identify which company receives user data. Overall, our results show that current disclosure practices fall short of the transparency needed for meaningful informed consent. We argue for a significantly updated regulatory framework for therapy apps that more closely aligns with the professional and ethical standards that bind licensed human therapists.

Explore related subjects

cs.CRcs.CY

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Chloe Georgiou, Hans Lu, Emiliano De Cristofaro, Gene Tsudik. 2026-05-03. What's on Your Mind? Exploring Privacy of Mental Health Apps. https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.02016

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

Discover connections

cs.CR subjectcs.CY subject

Connections use source metadata and explicit phrase matches, not verified experimental comparisons.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Empirical Evaluation of Membership Inference Attacks on NLP Text Classifiers: A Baseline Study on SST-2

Membership inference attacks (MIAs) try to determine whether a specific record was used to train a model, a privacy risk that matters in natural language processing (NLP), where training data can contain sensitive user text. This paper presents a controlled benchmark of membership inference vulnerability for text classification on the GLUE SST-2 sentiment dataset. A TF-IDF + Logistic Regression pipeline and a fine-tuned DistilBERT classifier are compared under a loss-threshold MIA, with utility measured by development accuracy and macro F1. DistilBERT reached 0.9466 accuracy and 0.9460 macro F1 against 0.8756 and 0.8727 for Logistic Regression, yet both models leaked membership signal (Attack AUC 0.5615 and 0.5800, respectively). Two mitigations were tested. Stronger regularization reduced leakage for Logistic Regression at a visible utility cost, whereas fine-tuning DistilBERT for 2 epochs instead of 3 reduced leakage with negligible accuracy loss. Lightweight training adjustments can improve the privacy-utility trade-off without complex defenses.

cs.CR↗
arXiv2026

Empirical Evaluation of Data Poisoning Attacks in Supervised Learning

Data poisoning corrupts training data to degrade a model or to plant attacker-controlled behavior. This study evaluates two representative training-time attacks, label flipping and backdoor poisoning, on MNIST and Fashion-MNIST with three baseline classifiers: Logistic Regression, Linear SVM, and Random Forest. Clean training is compared with poisoning rates of 5%, 10%, and 20% using clean-test accuracy, macro-precision, macro-recall, macro-F1, and, for backdoors, attack success rate. Label flipping caused clear degradation, largest for Logistic Regression and Linear SVM, while Random Forest stayed comparatively stable. Backdoor poisoning reached attack success rates from 0.9667 to 1.0000 on both datasets and all three models while often keeping clean-test performance near baseline. The results separate indiscriminate poisoning, which shows up in standard metrics, from targeted backdoor poisoning, which stays comparatively stealthy while embedding highly effective malicious behavior, and they support security-oriented evaluation beyond conventional clean-test metrics.

cs.CR↗
arXiv2026

DeFiFusion: Combining Transaction Events with Smart Contracts to Detect Price Manipulation Attacks

Decentralized Finance (DeFi) has emerged as a rapidly growing blockchain-based financial service, where market transaction dynamics and underlying smart contract logic are intricately intertwined. This autonomous interplay, while eliminating centralized intermediaries, significantly expands the vulnerability surface of DeFi protocols to Price Manipulation Attacks (PMAs), which have already inflicted catastrophic financial losses. Despite their gravity, existing detection paradigms suffer from fundamental limitations. Transaction-centric methods lack awareness of contract execution semantics, making them prone to false positives under legitimate market volatility, while static contract analyses ignore real transaction behaviors and frequently report vulnerabilities that are infeasible to exploit in practice. We present DeFiFusion, a dual-modal PMA detection framework that closes this gap by jointly modeling transaction events and smart contract semantics within a unified pipeline. Our core insight is that PMA maliciousness emerges only from the interaction between transaction behaviors and the contract logic they exploit; neither signal suffices in isolation. Accordingly, we derive price-manipulation-aware event encoding for extracting fine-grained temporal and economic features tailored to manipulation patterns. We further introduce LLM-based contract semantic extraction to supply the execution-logic context that prior behavioral methods lack. To fuse these modalities, we propose a Dual-Modal Projection-Fusion Transformer with T5-style relative positional encoding, capturing the cyclic multi-stage execution structures that distinguish PMAs from benign market activity. Extensive experiments demonstrate that DeFiFusion consistently achieves state-of-the-art detection performance, effectively recalling 222 of the 225 PMA cases while maintaining a precision of 96.10%.

cs.CR↗