arXiv Science⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2605.00839

2026 Roadmap on Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning for Smart Manufacturing

Jay Lee·Hanqi Su·Marco Macchi·Adalberto Polenghi·Wei Wu·Zhiheng Zhao·George Q. Huang·Kiva Allgood·Devendra Jain·Benedikt Gieger·Vibhor Pandhare·Soumyabrata Bhattacharjee·Ram Mohril·Lingbao Kong·Qiyuan Wang·Xinlan Tang·Sungjong Kim·Chan Hee Park·Byeng D. Youn·Guo Dong Goh·Xi Huang·Wai Yee Yeong·Yung C Shin·He Zhang·Zitong Wang·Fei Tao·Jagjit Singh Srai·Satyandra K. Gupta·Byung Gun Joung·Albin John·John W. Sutherland·Sang Won Lee·Olga Fink·Vinay Sharma·Faez Ahmed·Wei Chen·Mark Fuge·Arild Waaler·Martin G. Skjæveland·Dimitris Kyritsis·VispiNevile Karkaria·Yi-Ping Chen·Ying-Kuan Tsai·Joseph Cohen·Xun Huan·Jing Lin·Liangwei Zhang·Gregory W. Vogl·Aaron W. Cornelius·Xiaodong Jia·Dai-Yan Ji·Takanobu Minami·Ruoxin Wang
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

The evolution of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) is reshaping smart manufacturing by providing new capabilities for efficiency, adaptability, and autonomy across industrial value chains. However, the deployment of AI and ML in industrial settings still faces critical challenges, including the complexity of industrial big data, effective data management, integration with heterogeneous sensing and control systems, and the demand for trustworthy, explainable, and reliable operation in high-stakes industrial environments. In this roadmap, we present a comprehensive perspective on the foundations, applications, and emerging directions of AI and ML in smart manufacturing. It is structured in three parts. The first highlights the foundations and trends that frame the evolution of AI in smart manufacturing. The second focuses on key topics where AI is already enabling advances, including industrial big data analytics, advanced sensing and perception, autonomous systems, additive and laser-based manufacturing, digital twins, robotics, supply chain and logistics optimization, and sustainable manufacturing. The third section explores non-traditional ML approaches that are opening new frontiers, such as physics-informed AI, generative AI, semantic AI, advanced digital twins, explainable AI, RAMS, data-centric metrology, LLMs, and foundation models for highly connected and complex manufacturing systems. By identifying both opportunities and remaining barriers across these areas, this roadmap outlines the advances needed in methods, integration strategies, and industrial adoption. We hope this roadmap will serve as a guide for researchers, engineers, and practitioners to accelerate innovation, align academic and industrial priorities, and ensure that AI-driven smart manufacturing delivers reliable, sustainable, and scalable impact for the future of manufacturing ecosystems.

Explore related subjects

cs.AIcs.LG

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Jay Lee, Hanqi Su, Marco Macchi, Adalberto Polenghi, Wei Wu, Zhiheng Zhao, George Q. Huang, Kiva Allgood, Devendra Jain, Benedikt Gieger, Vibhor Pandhare, Soumyabrata Bhattacharjee, Ram Mohril, Lingbao Kong, Qiyuan Wang, Xinlan Tang, Sungjong Kim, Chan Hee Park, Byeng D. Youn, Guo Dong Goh, Xi Huang, Wai Yee Yeong, Yung C Shin, He Zhang, Zitong Wang, Fei Tao, Jagjit Singh Srai, Satyandra K. Gupta, Byung Gun Joung, Albin John, John W. Sutherland, Sang Won Lee, Olga Fink, Vinay Sharma, Faez Ahmed, Wei Chen, Mark Fuge, Arild Waaler, Martin G. Skjæveland, Dimitris Kyritsis, VispiNevile Karkaria, Yi-Ping Chen, Ying-Kuan Tsai, Joseph Cohen, Xun Huan, Jing Lin, Liangwei Zhang, Gregory W. Vogl, Aaron W. Cornelius, Xiaodong Jia, Dai-Yan Ji, Takanobu Minami, Ruoxin Wang. 2026-04-05. 2026 Roadmap on Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning for Smart Manufacturing. https://doi.org/10.1088/3049-4761%2Fae5967

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Decoupling Readiness from Release for Tail-Aware Scheduling of Agentic LLM Workflows

Agentic LLM workflows consist of sequences of model turns interleaved with tool interactions, so their end-to-end completion time depends not only on inference speed but also on when ready turns are released. Most runtimes release each turn immediately upon readiness. Under contention, this eager release policy can accumulate released but unfinished work; once submitted, those turns can no longer be reordered by the workflow-level policy, increasing tail latency. We present a tail-risk-aware turn release scheduling method that jointly decides which ready turn to release next and how much released but unfinished work to maintain. The method uses a mean--Conditional Value-at-Risk (CVaR) objective to capture the evolving tail risk of unfinished workflows, incorporates online estimates of turn work when prioritizing ready turns, and adapts the released work budget to observed queue pressure. We evaluate the method using real agent execution traces from software engineering tasks across multiple LLMs and workflow arrival rates. The method performs comparably to eager release under light load and substantially reduces the P95 of workflow flow time under contention, achieving up to a \(3.50\times\) speedup.

cs.AI↗
arXiv2026

Demystifying the Privacy-Utility Trade-off in LLM Interactions

The integration of Large Language Models into daily tasks relies on context-rich instructions, inevitably exposing sensitive user information. Current privacy-preserving methods typically employ context-agnostic static rules, causing severe utility degradation. However, the specific mechanisms governing how sanitization impacts downstream performance remain largely underexplored. To address this, we conduct a systematic analysis to deconstruct the privacy-utility trade-off, uncovering three underlying mechanisms: (1) Context-Dependent Utility, which first establishes when to sanitize by revealing that data value shifts from critical constraints to dispensable noise based on user intent; (2) Strategic Adaptation, which subsequently determines how to sanitize by dictating that the choice between removal and replacement depends on the task's reliance on factual integrity versus structural coherence; and (3) Combinatorial Interplay, which finally extends the protection scope by demonstrating that attributes form a semantic web of synergistic dependencies or antagonistic redundancies. Guided by these insights, we introduce an intent-driven local protection framework. By distilling a lightweight model Veilmind-4B to drive a dynamic extraction-sanitization-restoration pipeline, our approach reaches a low-leakage privacy point while preserving substantially higher response utility than existing privacy-oriented baselines, advancing the privacy-utility trade-off toward the Pareto frontier.

cs.AI↗
arXiv2026

Defining AI Agents: A Compendium of Criteria, Metrics, and Benchmarks

The term agent in artificial intelligence lacks a standard definition, complicating the evaluation, comparison, and reproducibility of AI agent research. We address this ambiguity through a survey organized around five dimensions of agenticness: environmental interaction, learning and adaptation, autonomy, goal-directed behavior, and temporal coherence. For each dimension, we examine how the underlying capability has been conceptualized across prior work and synthesize the metrics, benchmarks, and evaluation frameworks used to assess it. This review provides a structured account of the current landscape of agent evaluation, highlighting both established approaches and areas where evaluation remains limited or inconsistent. We additionally introduce the Agent Compendium, a public-facing digital resource that organizes and extends the evaluation methods identified through this review. Together, the survey and compendium provide a common structure for evaluating and comparing agent capabilities across AI systems, supporting more reproducible research, clearer communication, and more systematic study of artificial agents.

cs.AI↗