arXiv ScienceSearch

arXiv · 2604.27908

Sufficient conditions for spanning $k$-trees in tough graphs

Abstract

The toughness of a graph $G$, denoted by $τ(G)$, is defined by $τ(G)=$min $\{\frac{|S|}{c(G-S)}:S\subseteq V(G)$ and $c(G-S)\geq2\}$. A graph $G$ is said to be $τ$-tough if $τ(G)\geq τ$. Let $k\geq2$ be an integer. A tree $T$ is called a $k$-tree if $d_{T}(v)\leq k$ for each $v\in V(T)$, that is, the maximum degree of a $k$-tree is at most $k$. A $k$-tree $T$ is a spanning $k$-tree if $T$ is a spanning subgraph of a connected graph $G$. In 1989, Win [Graphs Combin. 5 (1989) 201--205] proved that if $τ(G)\geq\frac{1}{k-2}$, where $k\geq3$, then $G$ contains a spanning $k$-tree. Liu, Fan and Shu [Discrete Math. 348 (2025) 114593] provided a tight sufficient condition based on the spectral condition for connected $\frac{1}{k}$-tough and $\frac{1}{k-1}$-tough graphs to contain a spanning $k$-tree, where $k\geq3$ is an integer. A natural and interesting problem arises: Can the value of $τ$ be refined? When $\frac{1}{k-2}>τ\geq\frac{1}{k-1}$, we initially establish a lower bound on the size to ensure that a connected $\frac{t}{t(k-2)+1}$-tough graph $G$ contains a spanning $k$-tree, where $k\geq3$ and $t\geq1$ are integers. Meanwhile, we provide two sufficient conditions in terms of spectral radius and signless Laplacian spectral radius for a connected $\frac{t}{t(k-2)+1}$-tough graph $G$ to contain a spanning $k$-tree, where $k\geq3$ and $t\geq1$ are integers. When $t=1$, we obtain the result $η=1$ from Liu, Fan and Shu.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Caili Jia, Yong Lu. 2026-04-30. Sufficient conditions for spanning $k$-trees in tough graphs. https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.27908

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Small doublings in abelian groups of prime power torsion

Let $A$ be a subset of $G$, where $G$ is a finite abelian group of torsion $r$. It was conjectured by Ruzsa that if $|A+A|\leq K|A|$, then $A$ is contained in a coset of $G$ of size at most $r^{CK}|A|$ for some constant $C$. The case $r=2$ received considerable attention in a sequence of papers, and was resolved by Green and Tao. Recently, Even-Zohar and Lovett settled the case when $r$ is a prime. In this paper, we confirm the conjecture when $r$ is a power of prime. In particular, the bound we obtain is tight.

math.CO

Graph Polynomial for Colored Embedded Graphs: A Topological Approach

We study finite graphs embedded in oriented surfaces by associating a polynomial to it. The tools used in developing a theory of such graph polynomials are algebraic topological while the polynomial itself is inspired from ideas arising in physics. We also analyze a variant of these polynomials for colored embedded graphs. This is used to describe the change in the polynomial under basic graph theoretic operations. We conclude with several applications of this polynomial including detection of certain classes of graphs and the connection of this polynomial with topological entanglement entropy.

math.CO

Schur positivity of the spiders $S(a,2,1)$ and $S(a,4,1)$ via noncommutative symmetric functions

We prove that the spider graphs $S(a,2,1)$ and $S(a,4,1)$ are Schur positive for all integers $a\ge1$. Together with the known $e$-positivity results, this completes the $e$- and Schur-positivity classification of both families. Our approach uses noncommutative symmetric functions, including a particularly simple ribbon expansion for the path lift with coefficients given by powers of two. We give a new proof of the Shareshian--Wachs path formula at $t=1$ and construct corresponding lifts for spiders. The Littlewood--Richardson rule converts their ribbon expansions into a general Schur-coefficient formula in terms of weighted Yamanouchi words. Mass-preserving multi-injections and a reduction to finitely many inequalities in degree $10$ then prove the required positivity; exact computer verification of these inequalities completes the proof in full generality.

math.CO