arXiv Science⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2604.23772

PageGuide: Browser extension to assist users in navigating a webpage and locating information

Tin Nguyen·Thang T. Truong·Runtao Zhou·Trung Bui·Chirag Agarwal·Anh Totti Nguyen
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Users browsing the web daily struggle to quickly locate relevant information in cluttered pages, and complete multi-step web navigation tasks. State-of-the-art AI assistants (e.g. ChatGPT, Gemini, Claude) and browser agents (e.g. OpenAI Operator, Browser Use) can answer questions and automate actions, yet they return answers without showing where the information comes from on the page, forcing users to manually verify results and blindly trust every automated step. We present PageGuide, a browser extension that grounds LLM answers and actions not only in HTML DOM elements, but also in non-HTML DOM content, such as maps, images, charts, and timetables, addressing two core user needs: (a) FIND: locating and highlighting relevant evidence in-situ so users can instantly verify answers on the page; (b)GUIDE: au tomatically guiding users through navigation tasks while capturing relevant evidence for each intermediate task. In a within-subject user study N=53, PageGuide outperforms a non-grounding agent in both modes: in FIND, it improves accuracy from 90.1% to 96.3% and reduces judge time from 155.6s to 133.0s; in GUIDE, it improves accuracy from 71.4% to 81.0%, with judge time rising from 70.4s to 109.8s as users spend the extra time inspecting grounded evidence across navigation steps rather than believing the answer blindly. Code and demo are at: https://pageguide.github.io/.

Explore related subjects

cs.HC

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Tin Nguyen, Thang T. Truong, Runtao Zhou, Trung Bui, Chirag Agarwal, Anh Totti Nguyen. 2026-04-26. PageGuide: Browser extension to assist users in navigating a webpage and locating information. https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.23772

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

ShellVis: Sandboxed Live Programming for Shell Scripts

Live programming provides visibility to programmers by running and tracing programs as they are edited. However, for programs with potentially harmful side effects, liveness can turn mistakes into disasters. We propose enabling live programming in environments with side effects via sandboxing: confining effects to a simulation of the true environment. We apply sandboxed live programming in the challenging context of shell scripting: a ubiquitous and powerful---yet notoriously opaque and error-prone---tool. ShellVis provides line-by-line feedback on a shell script's run-time behavior, with file operations sandboxed via a safe overlay of the file system. A qualitative user evaluation finds ShellVis to be helpful to participants, replacing tedious existing practices and instilling confidence. Participant responses also reveal areas for future research, particularly bridging the gulf of execution alongside the gulf of evaluation. ShellVis serves as a case study of how sandboxing can bring live-programming techniques into the many real-world programming contexts where side effects are important.

cs.HC↗
arXiv2026

Visual-Motion-Induced Modulation of Pedestrian Trajectories Using Spatially Distributed Multi-Display Signage in Public Spaces

Multi-display signage (MDS), now ubiquitous in urban environments, has the potential to influence human behavior and experience in public spaces. However, despite its unique capability to present spatially distributed dynamic visual stimuli, its current use is mainly limited to advertising. In this study, we propose a perception-based approach for laterally modulating pedestrian trajectories as a nonverbal means of guiding pedestrians in public spaces. The approach is motivated by vection, the illusion of self-motion, and uses laterally moving monochrome stripes, a standard stimulus in vection research, presented across spatially distributed displays to elicit postural responses that may bias pedestrian trajectories. We evaluated the approach through a controlled laboratory experiment and a real-world field deployment involving actual pedestrian flows in a national museum. The laboratory experiment examined whether the MDS setup induced trajectory shifts in the direction predicted by prior research on the behavioral effects of vection. The field deployment investigated whether comparable effects would emerge in aggregate pedestrian behavior during unconstrained movement under conditions closer to those of urban public spaces. In the laboratory, full-screen motion significantly biased walking trajectories in the direction of visual motion, whereas partial-stripe motion produced no significant directional effect. In the field deployment, opposing full-screen motion conditions produced direction-consistent differences in aggregate pedestrian positions. The field results, observed despite the substantial variability in real-world pedestrian flows, extend the controlled laboratory findings and provide ecologically valid evidence supporting practical MDS-based pedestrian modulation in public settings. The results further suggest that sufficient visual-motion coverage may be important.

cs.HC↗
arXiv2026

How AI Coders Discuss, Disagree, and Reach Consensus: Challenges and Opportunities for LLM-Based Qualitative Coding

The utility of AI in multi-coder qualitative coding has been widely discussed, yet little empirical evidence exists to delineate the contexts in which it performs reliably. We address this gap by quantifying the effectiveness of multi-agent LLM coding across varied qualitative datasets, revealing key contextual and structural factors that mediate coding outcomes. We developed a literature-informed baseline pipeline that enables AI agents to independently code, debate, and reconcile disagreements. Results revealed that coding accuracy depends on factors such as codebook length, qualitative data similarity, and agent disagreement. Notably, intense and unresolved debates between agents led to higher accuracy. Our analysis showed that while LLMs emulate many human discussion behaviors, they lack adaptive responsiveness to context. From these findings, we offer design recommendations for building automated coding systems. Our open-source AI discussion dataset and methodological framework lay the groundwork for advancing the design of AI-mediated automated thematic analysis.

cs.HC↗