QUACK! Making the (Rubber) Ducky Talk: A Systematic Study of Keystroke Dynamics for HID Injection Detection

Abstract

Modern computing systems implicitly trust human input devices, allowing USB Human Interface Device (HID) emulators, such as the USB Rubber Ducky, to inject arbitrary keystrokes while bypassing conventional defenses. Speed- and regularity-based heuristics are easily evaded through slower or randomized timing. Keystroke dynamics offers a behavioral alternative, but prior work primarily addresses user authentication rather than user-agnostic detection of automated input. Moreover, detectors that process or retain key identities may expose sensitive content. In this paper, we investigate whether timing alone can distinguish human from machine-generated keystrokes without per-user enrollment or semantic input features. We systematically evaluate lightweight classifiers using only hold and flight times in a controlled offline setting. Across progressively structured synthetic attacker families, we examine cross-generator transfer, mixed-generator training, attacker sophistication, and the effect of observation-window length on discrimination performance and decision delay. Our results show that lightweight models can effectively discriminate human from machine-generated input across the evaluated generators without content access or user profiling. Our analysis also suggests that greater synthesis sophistication does not monotonically improve evasion. Moreover, detection performance primarily depends on exposure to structurally distinct generation strategies rather than model complexity. This finding can reduce the number of attacker models required for training and supports the feasibility of content-independent, user-agnostic HID-injection detection, while physical HID validation remains necessary.