Embedded DNA Inference in In-Body Nanonetworks: Detection, Delay, and Communication Trade-Offs

Stefan Fischer

Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2604.13306

Embedded DNA Inference in In-Body Nanonetworks: Detection, Delay, and Communication Trade-Offs

Stefan Fischer

View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

In-body molecular nanonetworks promise early abnormality detection close to the source of biochemical events, but their communication capabilities are severely constrained by slow diffusion-based signaling and unstable alarm traffic. We study whether simple embedded DNA-based inference at the nanonode can improve alarm transmission to an external gateway. We compare raw reporting (RR), single-marker threshold reporting (TR), and embedded inference reporting (EIR) under a communication-oriented abstraction of DNA strand-displacement-based computation with marker gating, edge-triggered alarming, hysteretic state transitions, temporally correlated marker dynamics, diffusion-based alarm transport, and leaky gateway evidence integration. The simulations identify a bounded EIR success regime in the weak-to-moderate anomaly range: EIR can improve detection relative to RR and TR while remaining competitive in event-driven communication cost, especially relative to RR. The gain does not come from uniformly lower activity, but from more stable local alarm dynamics. EIR does not dominate globally; TR often remains cheaper when abnormalities are present, and EIR incurs additional local delay. These results point to a limited operating regime in which EIR is useful, rather than to a general advantage across settings.

Explore related subjects

cs.ET cs.NI

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeX RIS

Stefan Fischer. 2026-04-14. Embedded DNA Inference in In-Body Nanonetworks: Detection, Delay, and Communication Trade-Offs. https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.13306

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

System-Technology Co-Evaluation of A7 CFET and A10 NSFET Technologies from Cell Parasitics to Chip Reliability

Complementary FETs (CFETs) extend nanosheet FET (NSFET) scaling by vertically stacking n- and p-type gate-all-around (GAA) devices, thereby shrinking standard-cell area. The performance gain, however, cannot be assessed from device metrics alone, as CFET layouts also introduce larger cell-level parasitic resistance and capacitance (RC). In this work, we present a physics-based thermal- and aging-aware system-technology co-evaluation (STCO) flow to assess parasitic RCs in A7 CFET and A10 NSFET technology nodes. Our flow links calibrated device models, optimized standard-cell generation, automated GDS-to-TCAD conversion enabling accurate 3D parasitic RC extraction, full RTL-to-GDS implementation for an AI accelerator, multiphysics thermal analysis, and physics-based bias temperature instability (BTI) aging evaluation. Using the same device model for both technologies, we can isolate the impact of parasitic RCs and design at different levels of the design flow. The results of the AI accelerator design demonstrate that the A7 CFET reduces the chip area by 24.7% and the total wire length by 12%, improving the area efficiency TOPS/mm^2 by 74% relative to the baseline of the A10 NSFET. Under iso-frequency operation, results reveal that CFET voltage scaling reduces power by 68% and lowers power density from 148 W/cm^2 to 55 W/cm^2, which reduces the chip's temperature from 125 degrees C down to merely 62 degrees C. The resulting reduction in stress temperature suppresses 10-year BTI-induced degradation by 39%, reducing the required aging timing guardband by 53%.

cs.ET↗

arXiv2026

A Game-Theoretic Framework for Incentive-Compatible AI training Under Renewable-Energy Constraints

As artificial intelligence systems increasingly rely on distributed and collaborative training, the energy footprint of these processes becomes a shared responsibility. Modern AI training often unfolds across heterogeneous compute nodes-ranging from cloud clusters to edge devices-whose energy availability is spatially and temporally variable. At the same time, renewable energy grids experience growing levels of excess generation, creating opportunities to align computational workloads with low-carbon energy supply. In this work, we develop a game-theoretic model of carbon-aware AI training in which autonomous agents strategically choose whether to participate and how intensively to train under limited renewable energy availability. Each agent balances diminishing learning returns, rewards for remaining within green-energy budgets, and penalties for grid consumption. While our framework applies broadly to distributed AI training, we examine Federated Learning as a representative case study due to its decentralized structure and flexible scheduling. We analyze equilibrium existence, efficiency, and adaptive dynamics, and provide simulation evidence that appropriately designed incentives can eliminate grid-based energy usage while preserving model performance. Our findings demonstrate how incentive-compatible training mechanisms can enhance energy efficiency and sharply reduce carbon emissions under renewable-energy constraints.

cs.ET↗

arXiv2026

From Grid to Chip: Power Architecture, Stability, and Flexibility of AI Data Centers

The rapid growth of artificial intelligence (AI) computing is transforming data centers into large, dynamic electrical loads. Their deployment is primarily constrained by energy availability and grid-connection capacity, which is further aggravated by the ability of power-delivery architectures, control systems, and computing workloads to operate reliably during fast grid disturbances. This article presents a technological perspective on AI data centers as grid-interactive computing systems. First, it reviews grid-integration bottlenecks, evolving connection policies, grid-code requirements, which has fostered new technological trends via spatio-temporal flexibility available through workload orchestration, cooling systems, on-site resources, and energy storage. Second, it maps the evolution of power-delivery architectures from medium-voltage grid interfaces to chip-level, discussing higher-voltage DC distribution, solid-state transformers, wide-bandgap devices, advanced chip-level power delivery, and liquid cooling. Third, it establishes a three-level stability framework spanning rack-level DC-bus dynamics, facility-level converter interactions, and system-level grid-coupled behavior. The framework connects dominant instability mechanisms, including constant power load effects, impedance interactions, forced oscillations, and operating-mode transitions, with suitable modeling, assessment, and mitigation approaches. Synthesizing these topics, this article highlights grid-to-chip co-design as a central requirement for scalable AI infrastructure, linking computing workloads, power-delivery systems, energy buffers, and grid operation.

cs.ET↗