Exact Bayesian Planning for Simple Step-Stress Accelerated Life Testing with Competing Risks

Kiran Prajapat

Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2604.09259

Exact Bayesian Planning for Simple Step-Stress Accelerated Life Testing with Competing Risks

Kiran Prajapat

View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

We propose a Bayesian framework for planning simple step-stress accelerated life tests when items are subject to two independent competing failure modes We assume that the competing risks are independent, with lifetimes following Weibull distributions, and adopt the cumulative exposure model with a log-linear stress-life relationship to connect failure time distributions across stress levels. The optimality criterion is the preposterior variance of the $p$-th quantile of the lifetime distribution at use stress, evaluated without reliance on asymptotic approximations, making the methodology valid regardless of sample size. Building on the idea of quantile-based reparametrisation used in single-mode ALT \citep{zhang2006bayesian}, we extend this approach to the competing risks setting by reparametrising the model parameters for each failure mode to physically interpretable and approximately independent quantities, making it possible to elicit priors directly from engineering knowledge of device behaviour. Posterior inference is carried out using the No-U-Turn Sampler implemented in Stan, and the optimal design is located via Monte Carlo simulation over a grid of candidate designs. The methodology is illustrated on a real step-stress dataset for a solar lighting device subject to capacitor and controller failure modes. A comprehensive sensitivity analysis with respect to the quantile probability, the lower stress level, the prior hyperparameter specification, and the sample size shows that the optimal stress-change time is moderately sensitive to these inputs while the optimal lower stress level consistently favours operation close to use conditions, a finding that holds across all prior specifications considered.

Explore related subjects

stat.ME stat.AP

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeX RIS

Kiran Prajapat. 2026-04-10. Exact Bayesian Planning for Simple Step-Stress Accelerated Life Testing with Competing Risks. https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.09259

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Bias-Correction for Privacy-Protected Spatial Autoregressive Models with Application to Restaurant Network Analysis

Spatial autoregressive (SAR) models and their extensions are important tools for studying network effects. However, with an increasing emphasis on data privacy, data providers often implement protection measures that render standard SAR models inapplicable. In this study, we introduce a privacy-protected SAR model that incorporates noise into both the response and covariates to meet privacy requirements. With noise present in both components, the traditional quasi-maximum likelihood estimator becomes difficult to compute because the likelihood function cannot be directly formulated. To bypass this hurdle, we begin with a pseudo-likelihood approach, initially omitting the noise in the covariates. A Newton-Raphson algorithm is then applied to compute the estimator; however, the estimator is biased. To address this, we propose a bias-corrected Newton-Raphson-type algorithm that simultaneously accounts for noise in both the response and covariates. We further show, under appropriate regularity conditions, that the resulting estimator is consistent and asymptotically normal. To further enhance computational efficiency, we also develop a bias-corrected least squares estimator. Several extensions are discussed, and the finite-sample performance of the proposed methods is evaluated through extensive simulations. We apply the proposed methodology to restaurant transaction data from a third-party payment platform. Our method identifies a statistically significant competitive network effect among restaurants and further reveals meaningful restaurant-customer interaction patterns.

stat.ME↗

arXiv2026

A variational framework for modal estimation

Multivariate mode estimation arises in many statistical problems such as inverse problems, multimodal sampling, and density-based clustering, but becomes challenging in moderate to high dimensions, especially when the underlying density is not directly evaluable. We introduce GERVE (Gibbs-measure Entropy-Regularized Variational Estimation), a sample-based method for estimating multivariate modes by approximating Gibbs distributions directly from samples, without estimating or evaluating the density. GERVE uses Gaussian-mixture variational annealing and natural-gradient optimization, producing a mixture concentrated in high-density regions whose component responsibilities also provide a clustering of the observations. We prove theoretical guarantees in two regimes: as the Gibbs temperature goes to zero, the optimal variational mixture concentrates around the global modes of the population density; at fixed positive temperature, we prove existence, consistency, and asymptotic normality of empirical maximizers and propose a bootstrap procedure for uncertainty quantification. Simulations and a real-data experiment show that GERVE accurately recovers modes and produces meaningful clusters.

stat.ME↗

arXiv2026

Objective Model Prior Probabilities in Variable Selection

For many years it was routine to use equal model prior probabilities in Bayesian model uncertainty analysis. At least twenty years ago it became clear that this was problematic, leading to support of much too large models in the increasingly huge model spaces being considered in genomics and other fields. A popular replacement was to adopt a suggestion of Harold Jeffreys for the variable selection problem in which a total of $k$ possible variables are being considered for inclusion in the model: give the collection of all models containing $d$ variables ($d = 0, . . . , k$) prior probability $1/(k + 1)$ and then divide this prior probability equally among the models in the collection. Many other choices of model prior probabilities that impose severe parsimony have also been introduced. We begin by reviewing the problems with using equal model prior probabilities and then discuss some serious problems with the Jeffreys choice. Finally, we introduce and study a number of objective alternative choices of model prior probabilities, from both numerical and theoretical perspectives.

stat.ME↗