Semiparametric Causal Mediation Analysis for Linear Models with Non-Gaussian Errors: Applications to Drug Treatment and Social Program Evaluation

Mijeong Kim

Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2604.08346

Semiparametric Causal Mediation Analysis for Linear Models with Non-Gaussian Errors: Applications to Drug Treatment and Social Program Evaluation

Mijeong Kim

View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

\textbf{Background:} Mediation analysis is widely used to investigate how treatments and programs exert their effects, but standard ordinary least squares (OLS) inference can be unreliable when regression errors are non-Gaussian. In medical and public-health studies, this can affect whether indirect and direct effects are judged clinically or scientifically meaningful. \textbf{Methods:} We developed a semiparametric causal mediation framework for linear models allowing possibly non-Gaussian errors, covering both standard models and models with treatment--mediator interaction. The method combines semiparametric efficient regression estimation, a reproducible multi-start fitting algorithm for numerical stability, and stacked estimating equations for confidence-interval construction without requiring Gaussian error assumptions. \textbf{Results:} Across Gaussian, skewed, and mixture-error simulations, the semiparametric estimator reduced root mean squared error and confidence-interval length relative to OLS, with the largest gains under non-Gaussian errors. In a near-boundary power design, the OLS confidence interval achieved 18.3\% empirical power, whereas the semiparametric confidence interval identified significant effects in all replications. In the \textit{uis} drug-treatment data, it yielded sharper treatment-specific effect estimates under clear treatment--mediator interaction. In the \textit{jobs} social-program data, the semiparametric analysis produced shorter confidence intervals for mediated effects and detected nonzero mediation where OLS did not. \textbf{Conclusions:} Semiparametric mediation analysis can improve the precision and reliability of effect decomposition in studies with non-Gaussian outcomes, offering a practical alternative to OLS when indirect and direct effects may inform clinical or policy decision-making.

Explore related subjects

stat.ME

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeX RIS

Mijeong Kim. 2026-04-09. Semiparametric Causal Mediation Analysis for Linear Models with Non-Gaussian Errors: Applications to Drug Treatment and Social Program Evaluation. https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.08346

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Bias-Correction for Privacy-Protected Spatial Autoregressive Models with Application to Restaurant Network Analysis

Spatial autoregressive (SAR) models and their extensions are important tools for studying network effects. However, with an increasing emphasis on data privacy, data providers often implement protection measures that render standard SAR models inapplicable. In this study, we introduce a privacy-protected SAR model that incorporates noise into both the response and covariates to meet privacy requirements. With noise present in both components, the traditional quasi-maximum likelihood estimator becomes difficult to compute because the likelihood function cannot be directly formulated. To bypass this hurdle, we begin with a pseudo-likelihood approach, initially omitting the noise in the covariates. A Newton-Raphson algorithm is then applied to compute the estimator; however, the estimator is biased. To address this, we propose a bias-corrected Newton-Raphson-type algorithm that simultaneously accounts for noise in both the response and covariates. We further show, under appropriate regularity conditions, that the resulting estimator is consistent and asymptotically normal. To further enhance computational efficiency, we also develop a bias-corrected least squares estimator. Several extensions are discussed, and the finite-sample performance of the proposed methods is evaluated through extensive simulations. We apply the proposed methodology to restaurant transaction data from a third-party payment platform. Our method identifies a statistically significant competitive network effect among restaurants and further reveals meaningful restaurant-customer interaction patterns.

stat.ME↗

arXiv2026

A variational framework for modal estimation

Multivariate mode estimation arises in many statistical problems such as inverse problems, multimodal sampling, and density-based clustering, but becomes challenging in moderate to high dimensions, especially when the underlying density is not directly evaluable. We introduce GERVE (Gibbs-measure Entropy-Regularized Variational Estimation), a sample-based method for estimating multivariate modes by approximating Gibbs distributions directly from samples, without estimating or evaluating the density. GERVE uses Gaussian-mixture variational annealing and natural-gradient optimization, producing a mixture concentrated in high-density regions whose component responsibilities also provide a clustering of the observations. We prove theoretical guarantees in two regimes: as the Gibbs temperature goes to zero, the optimal variational mixture concentrates around the global modes of the population density; at fixed positive temperature, we prove existence, consistency, and asymptotic normality of empirical maximizers and propose a bootstrap procedure for uncertainty quantification. Simulations and a real-data experiment show that GERVE accurately recovers modes and produces meaningful clusters.

stat.ME↗

arXiv2026

Objective Model Prior Probabilities in Variable Selection

For many years it was routine to use equal model prior probabilities in Bayesian model uncertainty analysis. At least twenty years ago it became clear that this was problematic, leading to support of much too large models in the increasingly huge model spaces being considered in genomics and other fields. A popular replacement was to adopt a suggestion of Harold Jeffreys for the variable selection problem in which a total of $k$ possible variables are being considered for inclusion in the model: give the collection of all models containing $d$ variables ($d = 0, . . . , k$) prior probability $1/(k + 1)$ and then divide this prior probability equally among the models in the collection. Many other choices of model prior probabilities that impose severe parsimony have also been introduced. We begin by reviewing the problems with using equal model prior probabilities and then discuss some serious problems with the Jeffreys choice. Finally, we introduce and study a number of objective alternative choices of model prior probabilities, from both numerical and theoretical perspectives.

stat.ME↗