arXiv · 2604.04473
Beyond Standard Benchmarks: A Systematic Audit of Vision-Language Model's Robustness to Natural Semantic Variation Across Diverse Tasks
Abstract
Recent advances in vision-language models (VLMs) trained on web-scale image-text pairs have enabled impressive zero-shot transfer across a diverse range of visual tasks. However, comprehensive and independent evaluation beyond standard benchmarks is essential to understand their robustness, limitations, and real-world applicability. This paper presents a systematic evaluation framework for VLMs under natural adversarial scenarios for diverse downstream tasks, which has been overlooked in previous evaluation works. We evaluate a wide range of VLMs (CLIP, robust CLIP, BLIP2, and SigLIP2) on curated adversarial datasets (typographic attacks, ImageNet-A, and natural language-induced adversarial examples). We measure the natural adversarial performance of selected VLMs for zero-shot image classification, semantic segmentation, and visual question answering. Our analysis reveals that robust CLIP models can amplify natural adversarial vulnerabilities, and CLIP models significantly reduce performance for natural language-induced adversarial examples. Additionally, we provide interpretable analyses to identify failure modes. We hope our findings inspire future research in robust and fair multimodal pattern recognition.
Explore related subjects
Keep this discovery
Jia Chengyu, AprilPyone MaungMaung, Huy H. Nguyen, Jinyin Chen, Isao Echizen. 2026-04-06. Beyond Standard Benchmarks: A Systematic Audit of Vision-Language Model's Robustness to Natural Semantic Variation Across Diverse Tasks. https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.04473
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.