arXiv · 2604.02668
Too Polite to Disagree: Understanding Sycophancy Propagation in Multi-Agent Systems
Abstract
Large language models (LLMs) often exhibit sycophancy: agreement with user stance even when it conflicts with the model's opinion. While prior work has mostly studied this in single-agent settings, it remains underexplored in collaborative multi-agent systems. We ask whether awareness of other agents' sycophancy levels influences discussion outcomes. To investigate this, we run controlled experiments with six open-source LLMs, providing agents with peer sycophancy rankings that estimate each peer's tendency toward sycophancy. These rankings are based on scores calculated using various static (pre-discussion) and dynamic (online) strategies. We find that providing sycophancy priors reduces the influence of sycophancy-prone peers, mitigates error-cascades, and improves final discussion accuracy by an absolute 10.5%. Thus, this is a lightweight and efficient way to reduce model sycophancy during discussions and subsequently improve downstream accuracy.
Explore related subjects
Keep this discovery
Explore connections, maps & timelines
Vira Kasprova, Amruta Parulekar, Abdulrahman AlRabah, Krishna Agaram, Ritwik Garg, Sagar Jha, Nimet Beyza Bozdag, Dilek Hakkani-Tur. 2026-04-03. Too Polite to Disagree: Understanding Sycophancy Propagation in Multi-Agent Systems. https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.02668
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.