arXiv ScienceSearch

arXiv · 2604.01573

When is cumulative dose response monotonic? Analysis of incoherent feedforward motifs

Abstract

We study the monotonicity of the cumulative dose response (cDR) for a class of incoherent feedforward motifs (IFFM) systems with linear intermediate dynamics and nonlinear output dynamics. While the instantaneous dose response (DR) may be nonmonotone with respect to the input, the cDR can still be monotone. To analyze this phenomenon, we derive an integral representation of the sensitivity of cDR with respect to the input and establish general sufficient conditions for both monotonicity and non-monotonicity. These results reduce the problem to verifying qualitative sign properties along system trajectories. We apply this framework to four canonical IFFM systems and obtain a complete characterization of their behavior. In particular, IFFM1 and IFFM3 exhibit monotone cDR despite potentially non-monotone DR, while IFFM2 is monotone already at the level of DR, which implies monotonicity of cDR. In contrast, IFFM4 violates these conditions, leading to a loss of monotonicity. Numerical simulations indicate that these properties persist beyond the structured initial conditions used in the analysis. Overall, our results provide a unified framework for understanding how network structure governs monotonicity in cumulative input-output responses.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Moh Kamalul Wafi, Arthur C. B. de Oliveira, Eduardo D. Sontag. 2026-05-14. When is cumulative dose response monotonic? Analysis of incoherent feedforward motifs. https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.01573

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Monotonicity, global symplectification and the stability of Dry Ten Martini Problem

We prove that, for every irrational frequency and every analytic Type I potential, each supercritical spectral energy satisfying the gap-labelling condition is an endpoint of an open spectral gap. This establishes the conjecture of Ge--Jitomirskaya--You \cite{GJY,You} in the supercritical regime. Consequently, the ``all gaps open'' property of the supercritical almost Mathieu operator persists under sufficiently small analytic perturbations. The main ingredient is a global symplectification of the center bundle that preserves quantitative monotonicity. This allows us to study gap opening through the center dynamics of the dual long-range operator, which has no natural Schrödinger form. We first establish the result for trigonometric polynomial potentials and then pass to general analytic potentials by controlling the dependence on the truncation dimension. The proof combines a discrete Hellmann--Feynman identity, dimension-free Aubry duality in weighted analytic norms, and a quantitative cone argument based on pre-monotonicity. These estimates ensure that the gaps survive in the analytic limit. Our results establish analytic stability of the Dry Ten Martini Problem in the supercritical regime and give a partial answer to a question of M. Shamis on the persistence of periodic spectral gaps.

math.DS

Asymmetry of a class of Mellin transforms via bounded solutions

We introduce a family of parametrized non-homogeneous linear complex differential equations on $[1,\infty)$, depending on a complex parameter $s$ in the critical strip. We identify sufficient conditions on the non-homogeneous term that induce a structural asymmetry between the solutions corresponding to the parameters $s$ and $1-s$. More precisely, if both solutions with initial value $1$ are bounded on $[1,\infty)$, then necessarily $\Re(s)=\tfrac12$. The initial condition associated with the unique bounded solution corresponding to a parameter $s$ represents a zero of the Mellin transform associated with the non-homogeneous term at the point $s$.

math.DS

Self-similar Delone sets and Pisot numbers

We consider Delone point patterns with self-similarity. Under mild conditions, the similarity factor is a Pisot number if and only if the pattern is uniformly discrete. The classical case is a Meyer set $Λ$ with $Λ\supset θΛ$ for some $θ>1,$ for which $θ$ must be a Pisot number or a Salem number. When $Λ$ contains several similar copies of itself, the case of a Salem number drops out for $θ<2.$ On the other hand, strictly self-similar patterns with a Pisot factor must be Meyer sets. Various examples are given.

math.DS