arXiv Science⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2604.00396

VLM-in-the-Loop: A Plug-In Quality Assurance Module for ECG Digitization Pipelines

Jiachen Li·Shihao Li·Soovadeep Bakshi·Wei Li·Dongmei Chen
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

ECG digitization could unlock billions of archived clinical records, yet existing methods collapse on real-world images despite strong benchmark numbers. We introduce \textbf{VLM-in-the-Loop}, a plug-in quality assurance module that wraps any digitization backend with closed-loop VLM feedback via a standardized interface, requiring no modification to the underlying digitizer. The core mechanism is \textbf{tool grounding}: anchoring VLM assessment in quantitative evidence from domain-specific signal analysis tools. In a controlled ablation on 200 records with paired ground truth, tool grounding raises verdict consistency from 71\% to 89\% and doubles fidelity separation ($Δ$PCC 0.03 $\rightarrow$ 0.08), with the effect replicating across three VLMs (Claude Opus~4, GPT-4o, Gemini~2.5 Pro), confirming a pattern-level rather than model-specific gain. Deployed across four backends, the module improves every one: 29.4\% of borderline leads improved on our pipeline; 41.2\% of failed limb leads recovered on ECG-Digitiser; valid leads per image doubled on Open-ECG-Digitizer (2.5 $\rightarrow$ 5.8). On 428 real clinical HCM images, the integrated system reaches 98.0\% Excellent quality. Both the plug-in architecture and tool-grounding mechanism are domain-parametric, suggesting broader applicability wherever quality criteria are objectively measurable.

Explore related subjects

cs.CV

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Jiachen Li, Shihao Li, Soovadeep Bakshi, Wei Li, Dongmei Chen. 2026-04-01. VLM-in-the-Loop: A Plug-In Quality Assurance Module for ECG Digitization Pipelines. https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.00396

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

SAMReg: SAM-enabled Image Registration with ROI-based Correspondence

This paper describes a new spatial correspondence representation based on paired regions-of-interest (ROIs), for medical image registration. The distinct properties of the proposed ROI-based correspondence are discussed, in the context of potential benefits in clinical applications following image registration, compared with alternative correspondence-representing approaches, such as those based on sampled displacements and spatial transformation functions. These benefits include a clear connection between learning-based image registration and segmentation, which in turn motivates two cases of image registration approaches using (pre-)trained segmentation networks. Based on the segment anything model (SAM), a vision foundation model for segmentation, we develop a new registration algorithm SAMReg, which does not require any training (or training data), gradient-based fine-tuning or prompt engineering. The proposed SAMReg models are evaluated across five real-world applications, including intra-subject registration tasks with cardiac MR and lung CT, challenging inter-subject registration scenarios with prostate MR and retinal imaging, and an additional evaluation with a non-clinical example with aerial image registration. The proposed methods outperform both intensity-based iterative algorithms and DDF-predicting learning-based networks across tested metrics including Dice and target registration errors on anatomical structures, and further demonstrates competitive performance compared to weakly-supervised registration approaches that rely on fully-segmented training data. Open source code and examples are available at: https://github.com/sqhuang0103/SAMReg.git.

cs.CV↗
arXiv2026

Q-SiT: Teaching LMMs for Image Quality Scoring and Interpreting

Image quality scoring and interpreting are two fundamental components of Image Quality Assessment (IQA). The former quantifies image quality, while the latter enables descriptive question answering about image quality. Traditionally, these two tasks have been addressed independently. However, image-quality-specific psychophysical studies suggest that these two tasks are conceptually interconnected: interpreting explicitly represents perceived quality attributes whereas scoring summarizes such evidence into an overall quality judgment. Thus, unifying these capabilities within a single model is both intuitive and logically coherent. In this paper, we propose Q-SiT (Quality Scoring and Interpreting joint Teaching), a unified framework that enables large multimodal models (LMMs) to learn both image quality scoring and interpreting simultaneously. We achieve this by transforming conventional IQA datasets into learnable question-answering datasets and incorporating human-annotated quality interpreting data for training. Furthermore, we introduce an efficient scoring \& interpreting balance strategy, which first determines the optimal data mix ratio on lightweight LMMs and then maps this ratio to primary LMMs for fine-tuning adjustment. This strategy not only mitigates task interference and enhances cross-task knowledge transfer but also significantly reduces computational costs compared to direct optimization on full-scale LMMs. With this joint learning framework and corresponding training strategy, we develop Q-SiT, the first model capable of simultaneously performing image quality scoring and interpreting tasks, along with its lightweight variant, Q-SiT-mini. Experimental results demonstrate that Q-SiT achieves strong performance in both tasks with superior generalization IQA abilities, while Q-SiT-mini significantly reduces computational overhead while maintaining competitive performance.

cs.CV↗
arXiv2026

Preserving Guidance in Cost-Volume Retrieval under Extreme LiDAR Sparsity in Iterative Stereo

While accurate LiDAR depth has been shown to improve stereo matching, high-end LiDAR remains costly and difficult to deploy at scale, motivating guidance from sparse LiDAR measurements. In this paper, we revisit how extremely sparse LiDAR can guide iterative stereo by examining its cost-volume retrieval mechanism. Our analysis shows that LiDAR guidance degrades sharply when only a few hundred points are available, and we provide a signal-processing explanation for why iterative stereo fails to fully exploit such sparse input. This insight leads to a simple yet highly effective remedy: pre-filling the initial disparity map so that cost-volume retrieval becomes more reliable under extremely sparse LiDAR. We find that pre-filling is also effective when injecting LiDAR depth into image features via early fusion, but for a fundamentally different reason, necessitating a distinct pre-filling approach. Combining both forms of guidance, our proposed Guided RAFT-Stereo (GRAFT-Stereo) achieves substantial improvements over existing LiDAR-guided stereo methods across multiple datasets.

cs.CV↗