arXiv ScienceSearch

arXiv · 2603.29716

A Graded Modal Dependent Type Theory with Erasure, Formalized

Abstract

We present a graded modal type theory, a dependent type theory with grades that can be used to enforce various properties of the code. The theory has $Π$-types, weak and strong $Σ$-types, natural numbers, an empty type, and a universe, and we also extend the theory with weak and strong unit types and graded $Σ$-types. The theory is parameterized by a modality structure, a kind of partially ordered semiring, whose elements (grades) are used to track the usage of variables in terms and types. Different modalities are possible. We focus mainly on quantitative properties, in particular erasure: with the erasure modality one can mark function arguments as erasable. The theory is fully formalized in Agda. The formalization, which uses a syntactic Kripke logical relation at its core and is based on earlier work, establishes major meta-theoretic properties such as subject reduction, consistency, normalization, and decidability of definitional equality. We also prove a substitution theorem for grade assignment, and preservation of grades under reduction. Furthermore we study an extraction function that translates terms to an untyped $λ$-calculus and removes erasable content, in particular function arguments with the "erasable" grade. For a certain class of modalities we prove that extraction is sound, in the sense that programs of natural number type have the same value before and after extraction. Soundness of extraction holds also for open programs, as long as all variables in the context are erasable, the context is consistent, and erased matches are not allowed for weak $Σ$-types.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Andreas Abel, Nils Anders Danielsson, Oskar Eriksson. 2026-04-30. A Graded Modal Dependent Type Theory with Erasure, Formalized. https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.29716

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

A Probabilistic Choreography Language for PRISM

We present a choreographic framework for modelling and analysing concurrent probabilistic systems based on the PRISM model-checker. This is achieved through the development of a choreography language, which is a specification language that allows to describe the desired interactions within a concurrent system from a global viewpoint. Using choreographies gives a clear and complete view of system interactions, making it easier to understand the process flow and identify potential errors, which helps ensure correct execution and improves system reliability. We equip our language with a probabilistic semantics and then define a formal encoding into the PRISM language and discuss its correctness. Properties of programs written in our choreographic language can be model-checked by the PRISM model-checker via their translation into the PRISM language. Finally, we implement a compiler for our language and demonstrate its practical applicability via examples drawn from the use cases featured in the PRISM website.

cs.LO

Monotone weak distributive laws over the lifted powerset monad in categories of algebras

Noticing the similarity between the monotone weak distributive laws combining two layers of nondeterminism in sets and in compact Hausdorff spaces, we study whether the latter law can be obtained automatically as a weak lifting of the former. This holds partially, but does not generalize to other categories of algebras: we then characterize when exactly monotone weak distributive laws over powerset monads in categories of algebras exist, exhibiting a law combining probabilities and non-determinism in compact Hausdorff spaces and showing on the other hand that such laws do not exist in a lot of other cases.

cs.LO

Identifying and Explaining (Non-)Equivalence of First-Order Logic Formulas

First-order logic is the basis for many knowledge representation formalisms and methods. Providing technological support for learning to write first-order formulas for natural language specifications requires methods to test formulas for (non-)equivalence and to provide explanations for non-equivalence. We propose such methods based on both theoretical insights and existing tools, implement them, and report on experiments testing their effectiveness on a large educational data set with > 100,000 pairs of first-order formulas.

cs.LO