arXiv ScienceSearch

arXiv · 2603.29629

On graph products and multi-word-representability

Abstract

The multi-word-representation number $μ(G)$ is the minimum number of word-representable graphs whose union is $G$. We investigate $μ(H)$ for graph products $H$ obtained from $G_1$ and $G_2$ via six fundamental products: lexicographic, Cartesian, rooted, corona, tensor, and strong. We prove $μ(H) = \max\{μ(G_1), μ(G_2)\}$ for Cartesian and rooted products. For the corona product, we show $\max\{μ(G_1), μ(G_2)\} \le μ(H) \le \max\{μ(G_1), μ(G_2)\} + 1$, and show that the lower bound is tight when $μ(G_1) > μ(G_2)$ or $G_2$ admits a covering by $μ(G_2)$ word-representable graphs, one of which is a comparability graph. For the lexicographic product, we show $\max\{μ(G_1), μ(G_2)\} \le μ(H) \le μ(G_1) + μ(G_2)$, and show that the lower bound is tight when $\mathrm{cov}_{\mathrm{comp}}(G_2) \le \max\{μ(G_1), μ(G_2)\}$. We provide logarithmic bounds for tensor and strong products. We prove $G^{[k]}$ is word-representable if and only if $G$ is a comparability graph. We establish bounds $μ(G^{[k]}) \le \mathrm{cov}_{\mathrm{comp}}(G)$ and $μ(G^{[k]}) \le k$ for non-comparability word-representable graphs. Using lexicographic powers, we obtain the sublinear bound $τ(n) \le n^{\log_8 6+ε}$ for the extremal function $τ(n)$. Finally, we address the Word-representable Bipartition (WB) problem, proving a negative answer for $n \geq 2593$: showing that for every such $n$, there exists a graph of order $n$ that cannot be vertex-partitioned into two word-representable induced subgraphs.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Benny George Kenkireth, Gopalan Sajith, Sreyas Sasidharan. 2026-06-29. On graph products and multi-word-representability. https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.29629

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Small doublings in abelian groups of prime power torsion

Let $A$ be a subset of $G$, where $G$ is a finite abelian group of torsion $r$. It was conjectured by Ruzsa that if $|A+A|\leq K|A|$, then $A$ is contained in a coset of $G$ of size at most $r^{CK}|A|$ for some constant $C$. The case $r=2$ received considerable attention in a sequence of papers, and was resolved by Green and Tao. Recently, Even-Zohar and Lovett settled the case when $r$ is a prime. In this paper, we confirm the conjecture when $r$ is a power of prime. In particular, the bound we obtain is tight.

math.CO

Graph Polynomial for Colored Embedded Graphs: A Topological Approach

We study finite graphs embedded in oriented surfaces by associating a polynomial to it. The tools used in developing a theory of such graph polynomials are algebraic topological while the polynomial itself is inspired from ideas arising in physics. We also analyze a variant of these polynomials for colored embedded graphs. This is used to describe the change in the polynomial under basic graph theoretic operations. We conclude with several applications of this polynomial including detection of certain classes of graphs and the connection of this polynomial with topological entanglement entropy.

math.CO

Schur positivity of the spiders $S(a,2,1)$ and $S(a,4,1)$ via noncommutative symmetric functions

We prove that the spider graphs $S(a,2,1)$ and $S(a,4,1)$ are Schur positive for all integers $a\ge1$. Together with the known $e$-positivity results, this completes the $e$- and Schur-positivity classification of both families. Our approach uses noncommutative symmetric functions, including a particularly simple ribbon expansion for the path lift with coefficients given by powers of two. We give a new proof of the Shareshian--Wachs path formula at $t=1$ and construct corresponding lifts for spiders. The Littlewood--Richardson rule converts their ribbon expansions into a general Schur-coefficient formula in terms of weighted Yamanouchi words. Mass-preserving multi-injections and a reduction to finitely many inequalities in degree $10$ then prove the required positivity; exact computer verification of these inequalities completes the proof in full generality.

math.CO