arXiv ScienceSearch

arXiv · 2603.29506

Hierarchical Battery-Aware Game Algorithm for ISL Power Allocation in LEO Mega-Constellations

Abstract

Sustaining high inter-satellite link (ISL) throughput under intermittent solar harvesting is a fundamental challenge for LEO mega-constellations. Existing works impose static power ceilings that ignore real-time battery state and comprehensive onboard power budgets, causing eclipse-period energy crises. Learning-based approaches capture battery dynamics but lack equilibrium guarantees and do not scale beyond small constellations. We propose the \textbf{Hierarchical Battery-Aware Game (HBAG)} algorithm, a unified game-theoretic framework for ISL power allocation that operates identically across finite and mega-constellation regimes. For finite constellations, HBAG converges to a unique variational equilibrium; as constellation size grows, the same distributed update rule converges to the Mean Field Game (MFG) equilibrium without algorithm redesign. Comprehensive experiments on Starlink Shell~A ($M=172$, $θ=0.38$) show that HBAG achieves \textbf{100\% energy sustainability rate} (ESR) in all 10 independent runs, representing a \textbf{+87.4\%} gain over the traditional static-power baseline (SATFLOW-L, ESR\,=\,12.6\%). At the same time, HBAG reduces the flow violation ratio by \textbf{78.3\%} to 7.62\% (below the 10\% industry tolerance). HBAG further maintains ESR $\geq 93.4\%$ across eclipse fractions $θ\in [0,\,0.6]$ and scales linearly to 5{,}000 satellites with less than 75\,ms per-slot runtime, confirming deployment feasibility at full Starlink scale.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Kangkang Sun, Jianhua Li, Xiuzhen Chen, Jianyong Zheng, Minyi Guo. 2026-04-09. Hierarchical Battery-Aware Game Algorithm for ISL Power Allocation in LEO Mega-Constellations. https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.29506

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Learning in Structured Stackelberg Games

We initiate the study of structured Stackelberg games, a novel form of strategic interaction between a leader and a follower where contextual information can be predictive of the follower's (unknown) type. Motivated by applications such as security games and AI safety, we show how this additional structure can help the leader learn a utility-maximizing policy in both the online and distributional settings. In the online setting, we first prove that standard learning-theoretic measures of complexity do not characterize the difficulty of the leader's learning task. Notably, we find that there exists a learning-theoretic measure of complexity, analogous to the Littlestone dimension in online classification, that tightly characterizes the leader's instance-optimal regret. We term this the Stackelberg-Littlestone dimension, and leverage it to provide a provably optimal online learning algorithm. In the distributional setting, we provide analogous results by showing that two new dimensions control the sample complexity upper- and lower-bound.

cs.GT

Equilibrium and Infeasibility: A new solution concept for games

Addressing infeasibility in non-cooperative games has become an important topic, as many problems across different applications face this issue. In this paper, we propose a new solution concept for generalized games with possibly infeasible individual constraints. A solution is defined as the limit of a sequence of generalized Nash equilibria induced by games with penalty terms relaxing the individual constraints. Existence is established for a broad range of games and we provide conditions allowing to characterize a $ψ$-penalized solution as a strategy profile maximizing every player's utility over all her penalty minimizing strategies. A variation of Divide-the-Dollar serves as an illustrative example. We further establish the compatibility with the GNE and the solution to the Nash bargaining.

cs.GT

Subgame-Perfect Nash Equilibria of Plurality Voting with Abstention: a PSPACE-Completeness Result for Restricted Ballots

We consider sequential Plurality elections in which each voter may abstain or vote for a single candidate. Each voter assigns utilities to all candidates; for each voter, this induces a (weak) order over the candidates. Ties are resolved uniformly at random, and voting has a small positive cost, so that a voter prefers to abstain when their vote cannot change the election outcome. We consider a variant of this model where, for each voter, we additionally specify a prefix of her ranking, so that she is only allowed to vote for a candidate from that prefix (or abstain). We prove that for this variant of the model, deciding whether a designated candidate is among the election winners in a subgame-perfect equilibrium of the associated extensive-form game is PSPACE-complete. This partially resolves an open problem from the work of Desmedt and Elkind [2010].

cs.GT