Designing Human-GenAI Interaction for cMOOC Discussion Facilitation: Effects of a Collaborative AI-in-the-Loop Workflow on Social and Cognitive Presence

Jianjun Xiao; Cixiao Wang

Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2603.29285

Designing Human-GenAI Interaction for cMOOC Discussion Facilitation: Effects of a Collaborative AI-in-the-Loop Workflow on Social and Cognitive Presence

Jianjun Xiao·Cixiao Wang

View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Connectivist MOOCs (cMOOCs) rely on learner-driven interaction, yet their intentionally light facilitation makes it difficult to design generative AI participation that is both scalable and educationally productive. This design-based research study examined how human-AI interaction can be designed for discussion facilitation through a collaborative AI-in-the-loop workflow. Across two iterations in a five-week cMOOC (N = 606), we designed, deployed, and evaluated a facilitation system that combined network-structure-driven target selection, discourse-adaptive response roles, and mandatory human review before AI participation became visible in the community. Iteration 1 (Weeks 1-2) focused on refining the interaction design, showing that the most sustainable facilitation patterns were Guide (70.4%) and Amplifier (28.5%) responses and yielding explicit moderation standards for publishable AI participation. Iteration 2 (Weeks 3-5) examined how different forms of AI-mediated interaction related to social and cognitive presence. AI participation selectively enhanced Open Communication (r = 0.188, p = 0.006), Networked Cohesion (r = 0.274, p < 0.001), and overall social presence (r = 0.162, p = 0.015), while cognitive presence showed no overall improvement. More importantly, direct learner-agent interaction was associated with significantly higher social presence (r = 0.186, p = 0.004) and higher-order cognitive indicators-Integration (r = 0.206, p = 0.001) and Resolution/Creation (r = 0.350, p < 0.001)-than mere co-presence in AI-involved threads. The findings suggest that effective GenAI-supported discussion depends less on AI presence alone than on interaction design: reciprocal exchange, discourse-adaptive facilitation roles, and collaborative human review appear to be key conditions for productive AI participation in online learning communities.

Explore related subjects

cs.CY

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeX RIS

Jianjun Xiao, Cixiao Wang. 2026-04-04. Designing Human-GenAI Interaction for cMOOC Discussion Facilitation: Effects of a Collaborative AI-in-the-Loop Workflow on Social and Cognitive Presence. https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.29285

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Towards interactive evaluations for interaction harms in human-AI systems

Current AI evaluation methods, which rely on static, model-only tests, fail to account for harms that emerge through sustained human-AI interaction. As AI systems proliferate and are increasingly integrated into real-world applications, this disconnect between evaluation approaches and actual usage becomes more significant. In this paper, we propose a shift towards evaluation based on \textit{interactional ethics}, which focuses on \textit{interaction harms} - issues like inappropriate parasocial relationships, social manipulation, and cognitive overreliance that develop over time through repeated interaction, rather than through isolated outputs. First, we discuss the limitations of current evaluation methods, which (1) are static, (2) assume a universal user experience, and (3) have limited construct validity. Drawing on research from human-computer interaction, natural language processing, and the social sciences, we present practical principles for designing interactive evaluations. These include ecologically valid interaction scenarios, human impact metrics, and diverse human participation approaches. Finally, we explore implementation challenges and open research questions for researchers, practitioners, and regulators aiming to integrate interactive evaluations into AI governance frameworks. This work lays the groundwork for developing more effective evaluation methods that better capture the complex dynamics between humans and AI systems.

cs.CY↗

arXiv2026

Enhancing Large Language Model-Based Systems for End-to-End Circuit Analysis Problem Solving

LLMs have shown strong performance in data-rich domains such as programming, but their reliability in engineering tasks remains limited. Circuit analysis is particularly challenging because it requires both multimodal understanding and precise mathematical reasoning. This paper presents an enhanced end-to-end circuit problem-solving framework using Gemini 2.5 Pro as the backbone model for scalable engineering-education applications. We systematically evaluate Gemini 2.5 Pro on undergraduate circuit-analysis problems and identify two major failure modes: circuit-recognition hallucinations, especially source-polarity errors, and reasoning-process hallucinations, such as incorrect current-direction assumptions. To reduce recognition errors, we integrate a fine-tuned YOLO detector with OpenCV-based processing to isolate voltage and current sources for polarity re-identification. To mitigate reasoning errors, we introduce an ngspice-driven verification loop that supports iterative refinement with optional human feedback. On 83 problems, the proposed pipeline achieves 97.59% accuracy, compared with 79.52% for baseline Gemini. Across four hand-drawn diagram variations, accuracy improves from 60.61%--71.21% to 89.39%--92.42%, with statistically significant gains (p<0.005). On 43 problems from a different textbook, accuracy increases from 58.14% to 83.72%, further supporting cross-textbook generalizability. Error analysis shows that circuit recognition remains the dominant source of residual failures, particularly under varying diagram representations. Overall, the framework substantially improves the robustness, scalability, and generalizability of LLM-based circuit problem solving for engineering education and practical circuit analysis.

cs.CY↗

arXiv2026

GreenPassport: Request-Level Carbon Accounting for Cross-Border AI Inference

AI inference often crosses regional boundaries as prompts travel to remote data centers and generated tokens return to users. Regional averages cannot represent the resulting differences in serving hardware, electricity, and network delivery. Request-level accounting needs a common boundary for the service, serving site, route, local comparator, uncertainty, and data provenance. GreenPassport Carbon Accounting (GPCA) associates these inputs with each request. It estimates serving and route carbon, then selects a reporting level from the available documentation. Our public-data implementation covers data-center instances, accelerators, model families, electricity mixes, routes, and cloud-region carbon intensity. Against six accounting baselines and four energy-prediction baselines, GPCA reduced median absolute percentage error by 56.3% and median absolute error by 15.5% relative to EcoLogits under the aligned accelerator-energy boundary. It produced zero rule overstatement in the deterministic conformance tests. In the buyer case, the clean-electricity CN-West scenario produced 0.0148 gCO2e per request, 88% below the local service at 0.1220 gCO2e per request.

cs.CY↗