TORCH: Characterizing Invalid Route Filtering via Tunnelled Observation

Abstract

To mitigate BGP prefix hijacking, the Resource Public Key Infrastructure (RPKI) provides prefix origin authentication via Route Origin Validation (ROV). Despite extensive measurement efforts in IPv4, the protective impact of ROV in IPv6 has yet to be systematically assessed. Existing approaches suffer from limited observability into invalid route propagation: they often rely on a small set of controlled prefixes or cannot fully profile the filtering of in-the-wild RPKI-invalid routes, which undermines the accuracy of assessment. Furthermore, the inherent opacity of the IPv6 data plane exacerbates the difficulty of performing scalable and reliable active measurements. In this paper, we present TORCH, a novel framework for measuring invalid route filtering in IPv6. It repurposes open 6in4 tunnel endpoints as widely distributed vantage points for global measurement. At its core, we develop a cross-plane inference technique that determines reachability without requiring responsive targets. This method allows us to characterize whether and how traffic is steered to invalid origins across diverse routing scenarios, leading to an in-depth evaluation of the real-world impact of ROV. Our measurements reveal that about 27\% of ASes have achieved nearly full ROV protection. However, several permissive Tier-1 ASes still transit traffic towards invalid origins, maintaining a substantial attack surface. Through a prefix-centric analysis, we provide the first empirical evidence that the collateral damage of same-length prefix filtering can affect a significant fraction of the global Internet. Our findings pinpoint fundamental vulnerabilities in ROV deployment and underscore the urgent necessity for network operators to accelerate RPKI adoption. We make our datasets publicly available.