The Problem of Dynamic Spatial Sampling and Geofence Surveillance

Abstract

Geofencing surveillance poses a dynamic spatial sampling problem. Police agencies must select a surveillance site, choose a geofence perimeter from a set of alternatives, and identify potential suspects through reverse location warrants. At the same time, warrant magistrates must impose constraints that curtail the reach of police surveillance efforts. This sampling problem emerges because agencies commonly use fixed geofence boundaries that ignore how humans move about a chosen surveillance site (i.e., pedestrian flows or traffic patterns). This further exacerbates privacy concerns and increases the risk of selective expansion where agencies extend their data collection efforts beyond the parameters outlined in their warrant. Given the Court's recent ruling in Chatrie, there is currently a need to establish a measurable process that allows magistrates to quantify and evaluate the potential impacts of a warrant proposal. In this paper, we take the first step in introducing a set of optimal radius estimators that measure how geofence perimeters adapt to their local context. Given a surveillance site and some privacy constraint, these estimators generate surveillance perimeters whose size changes with local population densities. This allows magistrates to quantify tradeoffs between local privacy intrusions with law enforcement's surveillance needs. We discuss the properties of these estimators, their underlying assumptions, and the potential consequences of using algorithms to better protect the privacy of its citizens.