arXiv ScienceSearch

arXiv · 2603.28325

Building evidence-based knowledge bases from full-text literature for disease-specific biomedical reasoning

Abstract

Biomedical knowledge resources often either preserve evidence as unstructured text or compress it into flat triples that omit study design, provenance, and quantitative support. Here we present EvidenceNet, a disease-specific dataset of record-level evidence collections and corresponding graph representations derived from full-text biomedical literature. EvidenceNet uses a large language model (LLM)-assisted pipeline to extract experimentally grounded findings as structured evidence records, normalize biomedical entities, score evidence quality, and connect related records through typed semantic relations. We release EvidenceNet-HCC with 7,872 evidence records and a corresponding graph with 10,328 nodes and 49,756 edges, and EvidenceNet-CRC with 6,622 records and a corresponding graph with 8,795 nodes and 39,361 edges. Technical validation shows high component fidelity, including 98.3% field-level extraction accuracy, 100.0% high-confidence entity-link accuracy, 87.5% fusion integrity, and 90.0% semantic relation-type accuracy. Downstream analyses show that the data support retrieval-augmented question answering and graph-based tasks such as future link prediction and target prioritization. These results establish EvidenceNet as a disease-specific biomedical knowledge base dataset for evidence-aware analysis and reuse.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Chang Zong, Jinyu Chen, Sicheng Lv, Si-tu Xue, Huilin Zheng, Jian Wan, Lei Zhang. 2026-09-05. Building evidence-based knowledge bases from full-text literature for disease-specific biomedical reasoning. https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.28325

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

Discover connections

Connections use source metadata and explicit phrase matches, not verified experimental comparisons.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Are Economists Open to AI? A Text-as-Data-as-Survey Approach via Language Models

Traditional surveys yield comparable measures but are costly to field, difficult to reconstruct retrospectively, and often ill-suited to fast-moving or sensitive topics. While large-scale internet text is often noisy and weakly structured. To bridge this gap, we introduce Text-as-Data-as-Survey (TaDaS). TaDaS employs Reference-Anchored Semantic Reparameterization (RAS) to project unstructured main text into survey-like evidence, leveraging structured auxiliary text as semantic anchors. Applying TaDaS to 1.25 million Economics Job Market Rumors posts linked with 53,585 top economics and finance publications, we track economists' evolving research sentiment toward AI. Cross-sectionally, AI-related research discussions are less open, with openness and curiosity declining rapidly at first years. Over time, however, economists have become increasingly open and curious, with a notable shift around 2018. Ultimately, TaDaS provides a scalable, non-reactive method to extract longitudinal insights from digital archives, unlocking diverse applications across industry and academia.

cs.CE

Training Communication-Efficient Mixture-of-Experts Language Models with Layer Re-Configuration

When training Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) language models with expert parallelism, all-to-all token dispatch and combine collectives can consume a substantial fraction of end-to-end training time. In this work, we study communication-efficient MoE models (CE-MoE), in which we adopt a heterogeneous layer pattern that decouples token-mixing and channel-mixing depth. Compared to conventional models which interleave MoE layers after each token-mixing layer (e.g., attention, Mamba-2), CE-MoE models concentrate expert capacity in a select few routed MoE layers, while maintaining depth by adding additional token-mixing and dense-FFN layers. Across a scaling ladder from 2B to 31.5B total parameters, under matched total and activated parameters, CE-MoE models consistently reduce training cost while matching validation loss and downstream benchmarks with full-MoE baselines. At the 31.5B scale, CE-MoE uses 33.3\% fewer GPU-hours while improving average downstream score and inference throughput.

cs.AI

Customer Relationship Intelligence: Integrating CRM and MDM for Enhanced Customer Engagement

This study examines how Customer Relationship Management (CRM), Master Data Management (MDM), and Customer Knowledge Management (CKM) jointly constitute a Customer Relationship Intelligence (CRI) framework for enhanced Customer Engagement (CE). A cross-sectional survey of 100 participants across retail, healthcare, IT, and telecommunications sectors was analysed using Spearman rho correlation and ordinal logistic regression (IBM SPSS). Bivariate correlations were weak and non-significant (r<0.19, p>0.06). Regression identified CRM (beta=0.717, p=0.002) and CKM (beta=0.581, p=0.009) as significant positive predictors of CE; MDM showed a positive but non-significant direct effect (beta=0.346, p=0.071). The model explained 20.5% of CE variance (Nagelkerke R^2=0.205). Parallel mediation analysis (Hayes PROCESS Model 4, 5,000 bootstrap samples) found no significant indirect effects of MDM on CE via CRM (IE=0.021, 95% BC CI [-0.072, 0.121]) or CKM (IE=0.032, 95% BC CI [-0.061, 0.126]); Hypothesis H4 was not supported. CRM and CKM emerge as the principal drivers of CE within the CRI framework, while MDM functions as a foundational data quality enabler whose strategic value is realised through its enabling effect on CRM execution and knowledge management. Findings should be treated as exploratory given the sample size and cross-sectional design. Future research should replicate with larger sector-specific samples and longitudinal designs, particularly in regulated BFSI contexts where MDM architecture is shaped by data governance mandates.

cs.AI