arXiv ScienceSearch

arXiv · 2603.28100

A Polynomial Coreset for Furthest Neighbor in Planar Metrics

Abstract

A furthest neighbor data structure on a metric space $(V,\mathrm{dist})$ and a set $P \subseteq V$ answers the following query: given $v \in V$, output $p \in P$ maximizing $\mathrm{dist}(v,p)$; in the approximate version, it is allowed to report any $p \in P$ with $\mathrm{dist}(v,p) \geq (1-\varepsilon)\max_{p' \in P} \mathrm{dist}(v,p')$ for an accuracy parameter $\varepsilon \in (0,1)$. A particular type of approximate furthest neighbor data structure is an $\varepsilon$-coreset: a small subset $Q \subseteq P$ such that for every query $v \in V$ there is a feasible answer $p \in Q$. Our main result is that in planar metrics there always exists an $\varepsilon$-coreset for furthest neighbors of size bounded polynomially in $(1/\varepsilon)$. This improves upon an exponential bound of Bourneuf and Pilipczuk [SODA'25] and resolves an open problem of de Berg and Theocharous [SoCG'24] for the case of polygons with holes. On the technical side, we develop a connection between $\varepsilon$-coreset for furthest neighbors and an invariant of a metric space that we call an $\varepsilon$-comatching index -- a sibling of $\varepsilon$-(semi-)ladder index, a.k.a, $\varepsilon$-scatter dimension, as defined by Abbasi et al [FOCS'23]. While the $\varepsilon$-(semi-)ladder index of planar metrics admits an exponential lower bound, we show that the $\varepsilon$-comatching index of planar metrics is polynomial, all in $1/\varepsilon$. The exponential separation between $\varepsilon$-(semi-)ladder and $\varepsilon$-comatching is rather surprising, and the proof is the main technical contribution of our work.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Kacper Kluk, Hung Le, Wojciech Nadara, Marcin Pilipczuk, Hector Tierno, Vinayak. 2026-03-30. A Polynomial Coreset for Furthest Neighbor in Planar Metrics. https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.28100

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Almost Linear Universal Point Sets for Planar Graphs

A point set is universal for planar graphs on $n$ vertices if every such graph has a straight-line drawing without crossings whose vertices belong to the set. We construct universal point sets of size $n^{1+o(1)}$, improving the previous quadratic upper bound. Our construction uses the reduction of Bannister, Cheng, Devanny, and Eppstein from universal point sets to superpatterns for $213$-avoiding permutations. We represent these permutations by ordered rooted forests and construct a small family of intervals containing every such forest. The result follows from a straightforward bound on the size of the family of intervals. GPT-6 Astra assisted in developing the construction and proof.

cs.CG

Some results on Archdeacon's conjecture for rotation systems

A rotation system on $n$ elements assigns to each element a cyclic order of the other $n-1$ elements. A four-element subset is non-planar if its induced rotation system cannot be realized by a crossing-free drawing of $K_4$. As a combinatorial strengthening of Hill's conjecture on the crossing number of the complete graph, Archdeacon conjectured that every rotation system on $n$ elements has at least $H(n)=\frac{1}{4} \lfloor\frac {n}{2}\rfloor \lfloor\frac{n-1}{2}\rfloor \lfloor\frac{n-2}{2}\rfloor \lfloor\frac{n-3}{2}\rfloor$ non-planar four-element subsets. We computationally verify Archdeacon's conjecture for $n\leq 10$ and show that every extremal rotation system in these orders is realizable by a simple drawing. With computer assistance, we prove that every rotation system on $n$ elements has at least $(8/9 - o(1)) H(n)$ non-planar four-element subsets. We also present a proof by hand for a weaker lower bound of $(2/3-o(1)) H(n)$. Finally, extending recent work of Felsner on antipodal pairs in drawings, we show that Archdeacon's conjecture holds for antipodally shellable rotation systems.

cs.CG

The Hyperbolic Surface Distance, Diameter, and Dirichlet Problems

Despite the prominence of hyperbolic surfaces in mathematics, basic algorithmic questions about them, even computing the distance between two points, have remained open, leaving many features of these surfaces inaccessible. The classical machinery assumes a polyhedral structure absent on a smooth surface. We remove these obstacles. We begin with an efficient $O(g^2)$ algorithm for the distance between two points, where $g$ is the genus of the surface. Building on it, we obtain an $O(g^2 \log g)$ method for answering distance queries from a fixed source and, as a consequence, for recentering a Dirichlet domain around an arbitrary point. This understanding of distances on the surface then lets us approximate the diameter to within any $\eps$ in time $O(g^3 \log g / \eps^2)$. We further show that the diameter, a single real number encoding a great deal about the surface, is exactly computable. Its hyperbolic cosine is an algebraic number over the field encoding the coefficients of the hyperbolic isometries defining the surface.

cs.CG