arXiv ScienceSearch

arXiv · 2603.27901

Dense Chains, Antichains, and Universal Partial Orders Inside a Bounded Finite-One Degree

Abstract

We construct a nonrecursive set \(A\le_T\emptyset'\) and a uniformly computable family of sets \(C_0,C_1,\dots\), all bounded finite-one equivalent to \(A\), such that the corresponding \(1\)-degrees form a copy of the dense linear order \((\mathbb Q,\le)\). Motivated by a recent preprint of Richter, Stephan, and Zhang, which shows that bounded finite-one degrees can be as rigid as a discrete \(\omega\)-chain and asks whether there are bounded finite-one degrees consisting exactly of a dense linearly ordered set of \(1\)-degrees, we introduce a block-density profile method for controlling one-one reducibility inside a single bounded finite-one degree. As further applications, in the same bounded finite-one degree we obtain an infinite antichain of \(1\)-degrees and, more generally, an embedded copy of every countable partial order. A single bounded finite-one degree can already exhibit dense, incomparable, and universal order-theoretic behaviour. Our main technical tool is a profile theorem based on computable block-density codings. The witness set constructed here is not \(m\)-rigid, so the phenomena obtained in this paper arise from a mechanism different from earlier \(m\)-rigidity-based constructions. Although our results do not settle the exact realization problem posed by Richter, Stephan, and Zhang, we show that density itself is not the obstruction: a single bounded finite-one degree may already contain a copy of \((\mathbb Q,\le)\), an infinite antichain, and embeddings of all countable partial orders.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Patrizio Cintioli. 2026-03-29. Dense Chains, Antichains, and Universal Partial Orders Inside a Bounded Finite-One Degree. https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.27901

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

There is no maximal $K$-degree

The Kolmogorov complexity of a string characterize how complex it is to describe the string. If every prefix of a real $x$ is more complex to describe than every prefix (of the same length) of real $y$, then it is seen as $x$ is more complex to describe than $y$. It is wondered if there is a real $x$ so that no other reals are strictly more complex (to describe) than $x$. The behavior of Kolmogorov complexity functions generated by reals (namely $n\mapsto$ the minimal description length of the real) is quite chaos. Therefore, it is widely believed that there are many reals that are maximally complex to describe. For instance, it is conjectured that all random enough reals have maximal $K$-degree. In this paper, it is shown that there is no real with maximal $K$-degree. Actually, for almost all real $x$, we can uniformly computably find another real whose $K$-degree is strictly above $x$.

math.LO

Quadruples and cubes

We prove, in $\mathsf{ZFC}$, that the $\lambda$-terraced cube relation fails whenever $\lambda$ is an uncountable cardinal. The corresponding terraced relation for quadruples fails for every $\lambda$. If $\lambda$ is $\aleph_0$ then the pretinent terraced relation has consistency strength of at least one Woodin cardinal. We prove positive polarized relations at a successor and a double successor from wondrous ideals. We show, however, that there are no such ideals over two consecutive cardinals simultaneously.

math.LO

Possibilistic Logic over a Logic of Formal Inconsistency

In this article, we have introduced a new possibilistic logic on a logic of formal inconsistency with the aim of developing a possibility theoretic framework to deal with uncertainty and inconsistency meaningfully without leading to a system collapse. We have discussed the syntax and semantics for this logic and have proved the soundness and completeness theorems. A set of new measures of consistency, contradictoriness, and triviality of a set of formulas have been defined. These have then been put to use in an example to show that this framework can provide better means of machine reasoning.

math.LO