arXiv ScienceSearch

arXiv · 2603.24595

M2K: Making the Model-Kernel Interface Explicit for Reliable CUDA Kernel Verification

Abstract

Large language model (LLM) inference systems rely on CUDA kernels for core GPU computations, yet the interface between models and kernels is implicit and poorly specified. Models and kernels evolve independently and often make incompatible assumptions about tensor shapes and input sizes, leading to subtle memory bugs in CUDA kernels. These bugs can crash inference services, corrupt model weights, or be exploited by remote adversaries. Existing techniques either incur prohibitive runtime overhead, require specialized hardware, or fail to handle dynamic tensor shapes and variable kernel launch configurations, leaving the CUDA memory bugs largely unaddressed. This paper presents M2K, a fully automated framework that makes the model-kernel interface explicit and leverages it to detect memory bugs in CUDA kernels used in LLM inference systems. M2K consists of two components. HFProbe traces model execution without GPU hardware, classifies kernel arguments into model-fixed and user-variable, and emits symbolic constraints that capture the interface. cuKLEE then performs symbolic execution on CUDA kernels to pinpoint memory bugs under the interface constraints, modeling tensors as disjoint memory regions and treating thread identifiers symbolically to scale to thousands of threads. In the evaluation, M2K discovers 181 previously unknown bugs in real LLM inference systems, while producing only nine false positives, demonstrating its effectiveness.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Mengting He, Shihao Xia, Haomin Jia, Wenfei Wu, Linhai Song. 2026-08-29. M2K: Making the Model-Kernel Interface Explicit for Reliable CUDA Kernel Verification. https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.24595

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

Discover connections

Connections use source metadata and explicit phrase matches, not verified experimental comparisons.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Towards a universal language of concepts: A survey

Humans can learn and generalize novel concepts from sparse data because they express knowledge in rich structural formats. In this paper, we propose that programs are a strong candidate for universal representation of concepts. We review computational models of concept learning that use programs as their concept representation and evaluate their contribution toward a universal representational language.

cs.AI

Causal Probabilistic Programming via Magmadic Do-Notation

We introduce a do-notation metalanguage for causal probabilistic programming. The metalanguage is based on magmads: non-associative monads. We derive causal probabilistic programming constructs from non-associativity and the primitives of probabilistic programming.

cs.PL

Implementing Grassroots Logic Programs with Multiagent Transition Systems and AI (Full Version)

Grassroots Logic Programs (GLP) is a concurrent logic programming language in which logic variables are partitioned into paired readers and writers. An assignment is produced at most once via a writer and consumed at most once via its paired reader, and may contain additional readers and/or writers. This enables the concise expression of rich multidirectional communication modalities. The language was introduced together with concurrent (cGLP) and multiagent (maGLP) operational semantics. Here, we derive from these (1) dGLP, a deterministic counterpart of cGLP, and (2) madGLP, a counterpart of maGLP in which deterministic agents communicate solely by asynchronous message passing, and prove them correct against their abstract counterparts. maGLP shared variable pairs spanning agents can be implemented by two local variable pairs joined by a \emph{global link}, with correctness following from disjoint substitution commutativity (a consequence of GLP's single-occurrence invariant). We further prove that madGLP is grassroots. Both dGLP and madGLP serve as formal specifications for an AI-driven implementation discipline (math $\to$ informal spec $\to$ Dart) employed and described here: from dGLP, AI (Claude) developed a workstation-based GLP implementation in Dart, and from madGLP it is developing a smartphone-based multiagent one.

cs.PL