arXiv Science⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2603.22356

Animal Welfare and Policy Risk Index (AWPRI): Constructing a Cross-National Exposure Measure of Animal Use and Governance Capacity, 24 Countries, 2010-2022

Jason Hung
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

This research paper introduces the Animal Welfare and Policy Risk Index (AWPRI), a composite exposure index covering 24 countries over the period 2010-2022. The AWPRI is constructed from 12 variables organised across three conceptual layers, namely Animal-use exposure (L1), Governance capacity (L2), and AI amplification (L3). Each layer is the mean of its own variables and the composite is the mean of the three layers, so a variable sitting in the three-variable layer carries more weight than one sitting in the five-variable layer. Variables are min-max normalised within each year, so a country's value on any variable, layer, or composite suggests its position among the 24 countries that year. K-means clustering of the layer scores selects two groups (silhouette coefficient = 0.504 at k = 2, against 0.444 at k = 3 and 0.330 at k = 4). Principal component analysis (PCA) of the 12-variable 2022 cross-section requires five components to reach 90.8% of cumulative variance, showing that the index is not reducible to a single dimension. The construction passes 46 robustness checks, with the rank correlation against the index as built staying above 0.98 under z-score normalisation, pooled min-max bounds, layer reweighting, and leave-one-variable-out. China (0.703), Vietnam (0.663), and Thailand (0.612) record the highest composite scores in 2022; Sweden (0.316), Kenya (0.339), and Germany (0.362) the lowest. Tested against the World Animal Protection (WAP)'s Animal Protection Index, the composite returns a null (Spearman \r{ho} = -0.264, p = 0.213, n = 24) while L1 on its own tracks the WAP grade (\r{ho} = -0.485, p = 0.016). The AWPRI and its interactive visualisation are publicly accessible at https://awpri.aiinsocietyhub.com/.

Explore related subjects

econ.EM

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Jason Hung. 2026-03-22. Animal Welfare and Policy Risk Index (AWPRI): Constructing a Cross-National Exposure Measure of Animal Use and Governance Capacity, 24 Countries, 2010-2022. https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.22356

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Identification in Linear Quantile Panel Models

This paper studies identification in linear quantile panel models with unrestricted individual heterogeneity when the number of time periods is fixed and small. We impose strict exogeneity, whereby the conditional quantile restriction holds given the individual's complete regressor history and latent individual effect, but otherwise allow the disturbances to be arbitrarily dependent over time.

econ.EM↗
arXiv2026

Experimental Design for Policy Choice

We show how to optimally design experiments when the resulting data will be used to choose a welfare-maximizing policy subject to constraints. A decision maker seeks to maximize Bayes expected welfare by choosing a policy whose effects depend on an unknown finite-dimensional parameter. The decision maker has access to a first wave of experimental data with a fixed design but may choose the design of a second wave that will be collected before choosing the policy. The resulting experimental design--policy choice problem is a very high-dimensional dynamic program that is generally intractable in finite samples. We propose a tractable approximation based on the limit experiment and show it is asymptotically optimal using a new asymptotic representation theorem for adaptive experiments with continuous treatments. We apply the method to a conditional cash transfer experiment and demonstrate the potential for large gains from tailoring the experiment to the policy choice.

econ.EM↗
arXiv2026

Designing Spatial Treatments

Spatial treatments are interventions assigned to locations potentially distinct from those of the responding units. We study their optimal design under a general model in which a unit's response diminishes with distance to a treated site. Our estimand of interest is an ``uncontaminated'' effect equal to the average impact of a single intervention site over all hypothetical sites. We propose a novel design based on a Mat\'{e}rn point process which separates treatments by a distance of at least $r$. A larger choice of $r$ reduces bias by separating interventions but increases variance by reducing their numerosity. We choose $r$ to maximize the rate of convergence of a Horvitz-Thompson estimator and prove that this is minimax rate-optimal. We provide weak conditions under which the estimator is asymptotically normal and propose a variance estimator.

econ.EM↗