arXiv Science⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2603.22344

Errors in AI-Assisted Retrieval of Medical Literature: A Comparative Study

Jenny Gao·Yongfeng Zhang·Mary L Disis·Lanjing Zhang
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Large language models (LLMs) assisted literature retrieval may lead to erroneous references, but these errors have not been rigorously quantified. Therefore, we quantitatively assess errors in reference retrieval of widely used free-version LLM platforms and identify the factors associated with retrieval errors. We evaluated 2,000 references retrieved by 5 LLMs (Grok-2, ChatGPT GPT-4.1, Google Gemini Flash 2.5, Perplexity AI, and DeepSeek GPT-4) for 40 randomly-selected original articles (10 per journal) published Jan. 2024 to July 2025 from British Medical Journal (BMJ), Journal of the American Medical Association, and The New England Journal of Medicine (NEJM). Primary outcomes were a multimetric score ratio combining validity of digital object identifier, PubMed ID, Google-Scholar link, and relevance; and complete miss rate (proportion of references failing all applicable metrics). Multivariable regression was used to examine independent associations. LLM platforms completely failed to retrieve correct reference data 47.8% of the time. The average score ratio of the 5 LLM platforms was 0.29 (standard deviation, 0.35; range, 0-1.25), with a higher score ratio indicating a higher accuracy in retrieving relevant references and correct bibliographic data. The highest and lowest accuracies were achieved by Grok (0.57) and Genimi (0.11), respectively. Compared with BMJ, NEJM articles had lower score ratios and higher complete miss rates. Multivariable analysis shows LLM platforms and journals were independently associated with score ratios and complete miss rate, respectively. We show modest overall performance of LLMs and significant variability in retrieval accuracy across platforms and journals. LLM platforms and journals are associated with LLM's performance in retrieving medical literature. Bibliographic data should be carefully reviewed when using LLM-assisted literature retrieval.

Explore related subjects

cs.IRcs.LGstat.APstat.ME

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Jenny Gao, Yongfeng Zhang, Mary L Disis, Lanjing Zhang. 2026-03-21. Errors in AI-Assisted Retrieval of Medical Literature: A Comparative Study. https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.22344

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Cross-Document Neural Re-Ranking via Query-Induced Subgraphs

Neural re-rankers typically score query-document pairs independently, neglecting cross-document context within the retrieved candidate set. We propose Graph Neural Re-Ranking (GNRR), a framework that extracts a sparse, query-induced subgraph from a pre-computed semantic corpus graph and applies Graph Neural Networks (GNN) to propagate cross-document signals. Unlike self-attention re-rankers, which scale quadratically with the number of candidates ($\mathcal{O}(K^2)$), GNRR achieves $\mathcal{O}(c \cdot K)$ online complexity, where $c$ is the fixed corpus graph degree and $K$ the candidate set size. We evaluate five GNN operators within this framework and find that architecture choice substantially affects generalization to harder queries: the GCN variant is the only one that consistently improves over TCT-ColBERT across all three TREC benchmarks. On TREC-DLHard, the most challenging evaluation benchmark, GNRR achieves $+5.2\%$ relative AP over TCT-ColBERT and $+9.0\%$ AP over a self-attention re-ranker. Notably, self-attention re-ranking degrades AP on DLHard ($-3.5\%$ versus TCT-ColBERT), suggesting that sparse corpus-graph structure provides a complementary re-ranking signal that dense self-attention fails to capture. Efficiency analysis shows that GNN models require fewer parameters and lower per-query latency at $K=1000$ than self-attention, with linear rather than quadratic scaling in candidate set size. Code to reproduce our experiment is available at https://github.com/difra100/Graph-Neural-Re-Ranking-via-Corpus-Graph

cs.IR↗
arXiv2026

LazFormer: Scaling Transformers for Industrial Recommendation via Transferable Generative Pre-training

Transformers have shown promising performance in LLMs due to their outstanding scalability, several studies have investigated the scalability of Transformers for industrial recommendation. They typically rely on a single ranking model to optimize both sparse and dense parameters from scratch, resulting in substantial computational resource consumption and slow convergence. Fortunately, the pre-training models offer an effective solution to the above issues by providing favorable initialization of both sparse and dense parameters for the subsequent ranking. However, they still face two major limitations: (1) Since the input features used in pre-training and ranking are usually inconsistent, directly transferring dense parameters from pre-training to ranking may lead to negative transfer. (2) Multi-epoch training during the ranking process may result in the overfitting of sparse parameters, while freezing the sparse parameters limits their adaptability to the ranking objectives. To this end, we propose a Scaling Transformer for Industrial Recommendation via Transferable Generative Pre-training, termed LazFormer. Specifically, we first present a generative pre-training module to autoregressively generate sequential features, providing favorable initialization of both sparse and dense parameters for the subsequent ranking. To solve the negative transfer of dense parameters, we propose a transferable residual adapter that injects additional ranking-specific features into ranking in a residual manner. Moreover, a request-aware ranking module integrates long-sequence compression, hybrid sparse attention, and a request-aware paradigm to efficiently model users' long sequences. Besides, we further propose an asymmetric multi-epoch training strategy that resets sparse parameters while continuously accumulating dense parameters across epochs, alleviating the overfitting of sparse parameters.

cs.IR↗
arXiv2026

Generate to Explore, Select to Exploit: Aligning LLM-based Headline Generation with Personalized Recommendation

In industrial recommendation feeds, presenting a static headline for an item often fails to satisfy the diverse, multimodal interests of the user population, particularly suppressing the needs of long-tail audiences. While Large Language Models (LLMs) have been integrated into recommendation for content understanding or ranking, directly optimizing them to output a single best headline typically leads to mode collapse---converging to generic patterns that satisfy average tastes but miss specific latent intents. To bridge this gap, we introduce GESE (Generate to Explore, Select to Exploit), a framework operating at the system's presentation layer that decouples personalization into generative exploration and selective exploitation. First, we treat the LLM as a probabilistic explorer, utilizing Group Sequence Policy Optimization (GSPO) with a hierarchical reward mechanism to generate a candidate set that maximizes the semantic coverage of potential user interests. Subsequently, a lightweight, real-time feedback-aware selector acts as the exploiter, identifying the optimal realization from the candidate pool based on instant contextual signals. Extensive deployment on a commercial platform with over 100 million daily active users demonstrates that GESE significantly outperforms state-of-the-art baselines, achieving a 2.57% lift in CTR and 0.87% in dwell time. These results validate that decoupling diversity-oriented generation from precision-oriented selection offers a robust blueprint for aligning generative AI with dynamic user utility.

cs.IR↗