arXiv ScienceSearch

arXiv · 2603.22308

Infinitesimals inside the Familiar Field of Complex Numbers

Abstract

We show that the field of complex numbers $\mathbb C$ contains non-zero infinitesimals by observing that $\mathbb C$ contains non-Archimedean subfields. Our observation is based on an old theorem in algebra due to E. Steinitz, discussed in the article in detail. The presence of infinitesimals in $\mathbb C$ was surprise to the author and might be surprise to the readers as well, since $\mathbb C$ is commonly defined in terms of the field of reals $\mathbb R$, which is Archimedean. An additional intrigue arises from the fact that $\mathbb R$ was historically introduced in 19-th century (by Dedekind, Cauchy and others) exactly to make infinitesimals in Leibniz-Newton infinitesimal calculus redundant. It seems that mathematics will never get rid of infinitesimals completely - they are all around us whether we like it or not. In the last section of the article we explain how our result fits to analysis, both standard and non-standard. With examples from history of calculus as well of first-class recent achievements in analysis we try to convince the reader that presence of infinitesimals in analysis simplifies its formal language and improves its efficiency. The motivations of our research is related to an attempt to simplify the properties of particular algebras of generalized functions of Colombeau's type, shortly discussed in the text.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Todor D. Todorov. 2026-03-18. Infinitesimals inside the Familiar Field of Complex Numbers. https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.22308

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

On the role of Giovanni Giorgi in the history of operational methods to mathematical-physics problems

In this paper we discuss the historical role played by Prof. Giovanni Giorgi (1871-1950) in the development of operational methods in mathematical physics. In the literature, the analysis of the scientific contributions of Giorgi is discussed in many historical papers mainly about the $MKSΩ$-system and its contributions in the field of electrical engineering. Starting from the obituary written by Prof. Dario Graffi (1905-1990), here we analyze in detail the contributions given by Giorgi in mathematical physics, especially in the framework of the studies started by Heaviside (1850-1925) in order to obtain a symbolic representation of the solutions of differential equations emerging in physical problems. \\ Moreover, we underline the little known contribution of Giorgi to the analysis of derivatives of any real order, namely fractional derivatives, according to the present notation. \\ The main aim of this note is to underline the historical relevance of Giorgi in the mathematical foundations of operational methods in relation to the solutions of concrete problems emerging in applied physics.

math.HO

Who Wrote This? Turing, Total Variation, and the Mathematics of AI-Text Detection

What can a finished text reveal about the process that produced it? Drawing on Turing's imitation game and statistical decision theory, this article examines the limits of AI-text detection as an inference from a completed object to an unobserved history. For two known source distributions with equal prior probabilities, a standard identity gives the minimum average classification error as half their probability overlap. This overlap is one minus their total variation distance. Perfect detection therefore requires nonoverlapping distributions; useful discrimination does not. In practice, the problem is harder: human and machine writing form changing families of distributions, posterior probabilities depend on base rates, and ``AI-written'' becomes ambiguous when people and software contribute to the same text. Turing's interrogator can ask another question; a detector restricted to finished prose cannot. Distinguishability, source attribution, authentication, and compliance are different inferential tasks. The paper's own documented human-AI provenance shows what a production history can reveal that a binary label cannot.

math.HO

LLAMA LIMA: A Living Meta-Analysis on the Effects of Generative AI on Learning Mathematics

The capabilities of generative AI in mathematics education are rapidly evolving, posing significant challenges for research to keep pace. Research syntheses remain scarce and risk being outdated by the time of publication. We present a Living Meta-Analysis (LIMA) on the effects of generative AI-based interventions for learning mathematics. We update the literature base every two months and apply a cumulative Bayesian multilevel meta-regression model. This paper reports results from the fifth version, including 34 studies, 7 of which were newly included since the fourth version. Results indicate an increasingly positive effect (g = 0.57, CrI [0.36, 0.79]) and no evidence in favor of a publication bias. Moderator analyses indicate that effects vary by integration mode and intervention duration: Larger effects were observed when generative AI supplemented teacher instruction and in longer interventions. Moderate evidence for stronger effects was observed in studies involving younger learners and more recent technology. For other moderators, evidence is still inconclusive.

math.HO