arXiv Science⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2603.20942

Accompanist: A Runtime for Resilient Choreographic Programming

Viktor Strate Kløvedal·Dan Plyukhin·Marco Peressotti·Fabrizio Montesi
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

In service-oriented architecture, services coordinate in one of two ways: directly, using point-to-point communication, or indirectly, through an intermediary called the orchestrator. Orchestrators tend to be more popular because their local state is a 'single source of truth' for the status of ongoing workflows, which simplifies fault recovery and rollback for distributed transactions that use the 'saga' pattern. But orchestration is not always an option because of hardware constraints and security policies. Without a central orchestrator, resilient saga transactions are hard to implement correctly. A natural idea is to use choreographic programming, a paradigm that brings the 'global view' of orchestrators to a decentralised setting. Unfortunately, choreographic programming relies on strong assumptions about network reliability and service uptime that often do not hold. Recent work weakens some of these assumptions with 'failure-aware' language features, but these features make programs more complex. We propose a complementary approach: to co-design the programming interface with a customizable runtime that can replay computation to mask faults. Our approach keeps programs simple, does not require modifying the compiler, and lends itself to a clean separation of concerns in formal proofs. We present Accompanist, a resilient runtime for the Choral choreographic programming language. With Accompanist, programmers can implement decentralised saga transactions as choreographic programs and deploy the compiled code to 'sidecars' that run alongside services in a pre-existing codebase. Our key assumptions are that choreographic programs should be deterministic, transactions within a saga should be idempotent, and messages should be written to a durable message queue. Based on these assumptions, we present a formal model and prove that target code is correct-by-construction.

Explore related subjects

cs.PL

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Viktor Strate Kløvedal, Dan Plyukhin, Marco Peressotti, Fabrizio Montesi. 2026-03-21. Accompanist: A Runtime for Resilient Choreographic Programming. https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.20942

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Multi-paradigm Logic Programming in the ${\cal E}$rgoAI System

ErgoAI is a high level, multi-paradigm logic programming language and system developed by Coherent Knowledge Systems as an enhancement of and a successor to the popular Flora-2 system. ErgoAI is oriented towards scalable knowledge representation and reasoning, and can exploit both structured knowledge as well as knowledge derived from external sources such as vector embeddings. From the start, ErgoAI (and Flora-2 before it) were designed to exploit the well-founded semantics for reasoning in a multi-paradigm environment, including object-based logic (F-logic) with non-monotonic inheritance; higher order syntax in the style of HiLog; defeasibility of rules; semantically clean transactional updates; extensive use of subgoal delay for handling unsafe queries and for better performance; and optional support for bounded rationality at a module level. Although Flora-2 programs are compiled into XSB and adopt many Prolog features, ErgoAI is altogether a different language and system. Under consideration in Theory and Practice of Logic Programming (TPLP).

cs.PL↗
arXiv2026

When is LLM-Based Program Reasoning Correct? A Completion Semantics for LLM-Based Code Inference

Due to token and cognitive limits, Large Language Models (LLMs) typically perform program reasoning over incomplete code fragments/prompts rather than complete programs. Such reasoning therefore must rely on {assumptions about omitted code and context. As a result, the meaning of an inference over a program fragment is not absolute, but depends on an implicit completion model describing how the fragment may be refined into a complete program. In this paper, we introduce completion semantics for LLM-based program reasoning. We formalize incomplete programs as denoting a space of possible refinements and define the correctness of existential inferences relative to a completion model. Under this view, a reported bug is correct whenever there exists a completion within the model that witnesses the bug. This perspective explains why many LLM-generated reports are neither simply correct nor incorrect, but instead depend on assumptions about omitted context. We have instantiated our approach in the form of a witness-generation workflow that concretizes completions underlying an inference by constructing executable refinements of the original program fragment. Witnesses serve both as evidence for existential claims and as a mechanism for exposing the assumptions required to support them. We evaluate our approach on real-world LLM-generated bug reports and program-analysis tasks. Our results show that witness generation effectively distinguishes inferences supported by plausible completions from those requiring unrealistic assumptions, providing a practical mechanism for validating reasoning over incomplete programs.

cs.PL↗
arXiv2026

Opportunistic ZGC: Leveraging Idle Cores for More Effective Concurrent Garbage Collection

Managed language runtimes often provide concurrent garbage collectors so that latency-critical applications with large working sets can keep running while most collection work proceeds in the background. ZGC is a production-quality, generational, concurrent collector in OpenJDK with sub-millisecond pause times. While ZGC is designed to run concurrently, frequent and excessive collections with ZGC can still slow the mutators due to synchronization costs and interference with shared computing resources. Hence, the ZGC scheduler is conservative by default, and in most cases, will grow the heap toward the maximum allowed before scheduling a collection. While this approach minimizes collection effort, it can be wasteful, or even harmful, if the maximum heap size is not well tuned to the actual working set. We propose Opportunistic ZGC (OppZGC), a feedback-directed ZGC scheduling policy that constrains the heap dynamically and automatically, without per-application tuning. OppZGC identifies periods when CPU cores are underutilized and leverages them for concurrent collection with ZGC. We describe the design and implementation of OppZGC in OpenJDK's HotSpot Java VM and evaluate it with standard and latency-sensitive benchmarks from DaCapo Chopin and SPECjbb. OppZGC limits heap usage when there is CPU capacity sufficient for additional collections, and avoids scheduling extra collections when they would substantially degrade performance. Overall, it reduces maximum heap usage for our DaCapo benchmarks by between 61% and 90%, on average, depending on configuration, with minimal impact on throughput and request latency compared to default ZGC.

cs.PL↗