arXiv Science⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2603.20767

The Process and Dynamics of the Nobel Memorial Prize in Economics, 1969-2025

Peter J. Dolton·Richard S. J. Tol
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

The Nobel Memorial Prize in Economics has been awarded annually since 1969. Who wins the prize is a topic of much interest and tracks the whole course of the academic discipline over the last 57 years. Explaining who wins the prize in any given year is a complex process, which involves the subtle endogeneity of the choice of the field and the individual(s) who should be honoured. Citations, track records, networks of past winners, institutional factors along with field rotation and Economic Prize Committee composition may all play a role. A dynamic sample involving a changing stock of would-be candidates along with a moving flow -- both into and out of the sample -- add complexities to the modelling. We find robust evidence that the Nobel Prize rotates in a semi-regular way between the fields of economics. Earlier awards were for a single paper, later ones for a body of work. Networks do not matter, but having a Nobel student or co-author does. There is some evidence that the personal preferences of Committee members had an effect on either field or individual winner. The Committee's decisions changed after Lindbeck retired.

Explore related subjects

econ.GNq-fin.EC

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Peter J. Dolton, Richard S. J. Tol. 2026-03-21. The Process and Dynamics of the Nobel Memorial Prize in Economics, 1969-2025. https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.20767

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

The Burst Market: The Next Leap for Humanity

Many useful human contributions remain unexchanged because exchange frictions exceed their value. This conceptual paper proposes the Burst Market (BM): a market for brief, paid, immediate human services delivered through live video. BM seeks to lower the minimum viable exchange through PIVOT: Provider-set price, Immediate access, Video interaction, Open participation, and Time-metered payment. A four-part friction map covers buyer access, provider market access, capability packaging, and assurance and governance. BM identifies seven rebalances, including AI job disruption versus underused human capability, and serves both scarce and underused capacity. As generative market infrastructure, BM may let people create services that established occupations and platforms cannot foresee. Seven conceptual propositions organize its mechanisms and predictions. If these effects emerge at scale, BM could represent the next leap for humanity.

econ.GN↗
arXiv2026

Local Media and the Shaping of Social Norms: Evidence from the Ebola outbreak

Media's influence on norms and behavior is widely recognized. Less is known about the role played by media being local. I examine this in a high-stakes context, the Ebola outbreak in Guinea. I exploit quasi-random variation in access to radio and the timing of a public-health campaign aired on community radio. I find that 12-17% of Ebola cases could have been prevented if places with access to a neighboring community radio station had instead had their own. Impacts are driven by radio being local rather than by ethno-linguistic belonging. Local media facilitates coordination in behaviors observed and sanctioned locally.

econ.GN↗
arXiv2026

A minimal model of money creation under regulatory constraints

We propose a minimal model of the secured interbank network able to shed light on recent money markets puzzles. We find that excess liquidity emerges due to the interactions between the reserves and liquidity ratio constraints; the appearance of evergreen repurchase agreements and collateral re-use emerges as a simple answer to banks' counterparty risk and liquidity ratio regulation. In line with prevailing theories, re-use increases with collateral scarcity. In our agent-based model, banks create money endogenously to meet the funding requests of economic agents. The latter generate payment shocks to the banking system by reallocating their deposits. Banks absorbs these shocks thanks to repurchase agreements, while respecting reserves, liquidity, and leverage constraints. The resulting network is denser and more robust to stress scenarios than an unsecured one; in addition, the stable bank trading relationships network exhibits a core-periphery structure. Finally, we show how this model can be used as a tool for stress testing and monetary policy design.

econ.GN↗