arXiv Science⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2603.18016

MineDraft: A Framework for Batch Parallel Speculative Decoding

Zhenwei Tang·Arun Verma·Zijian Zhou·Zhaoxuan Wu·Alok Prakash·Daniela Rus·Bryan Kian Hsiang Low
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Speculative decoding (SD) accelerates large language model inference by using a smaller draft model to propose draft tokens that are subsequently verified by a larger target model. However, the performance of standard SD is often limited by the strictly sequential execution of these drafting and verification stages. To address this, this paper proposes MineDraft, a batch parallel speculative decoding (PSD) framework designed to effectively hide drafting latency by overlapping it with verification. Our theoretical analysis shows that PSD is substantially more efficient than standard SD. MineDraft realizes the PSD through a novel batch-parallel design that maintains two batches of requests, overlapping drafting for one batch with verification for the other. Our experimental results show significant improvements of \alg{} in both throughput (up to 75%) and end-to-end latency (up to 39%) over standard SD. Furthermore, we have implemented MineDraft as a plugin for vLLM, demonstrating its practicality for production-ready inference systems.

Explore related subjects

cs.CLcs.AIcs.DCcs.LG

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Zhenwei Tang, Arun Verma, Zijian Zhou, Zhaoxuan Wu, Alok Prakash, Daniela Rus, Bryan Kian Hsiang Low. 2026-09-01. MineDraft: A Framework for Batch Parallel Speculative Decoding. https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.18016

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

Discover connections

cs.AI subjectcs.CL subjectcs.DC subjectcs.LG subject

Connections use source metadata and explicit phrase matches, not verified experimental comparisons.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Intelligence per Watt: Measuring Intelligence Efficiency of Local AI

Large language model (LLM) queries are predominantly processed by frontier models in centralized cloud infrastructure. Demand growth strains this paradigm faster than providers can scale. Two advances create an opportunity to rethink it: small, local LMs (<=20B active parameters) now achieve competitive performance to frontier models on many tasks, and local accelerators (e.g., Apple M4 Max) can host these models at interactive latencies. This raises the question: can local inference viably redistribute demand from centralized infrastructure? This requires measuring both whether local LMs can accurately answer real-world queries and whether they can do so efficiently on power-constrained devices (e.g., laptops). We propose intelligence per watt (IPW), task accuracy per unit of power, as a unified metric for the capability and efficiency of local inference across model-accelerator configurations. We evaluate 20+ state-of-the-art local LMs, 8 hardware accelerators (local and cloud), and 1M real-world single-turn chat and reasoning queries. For each query, we measure accuracy (local LM win rate against frontier models), energy, latency, and power. We find three key results. First, local LMs successfully answer 88.7% of these queries, with accuracy varying by domain. Second, longitudinal analysis from 2023-2025 shows IPW improved 5.3x, driven by both algorithmic and accelerator advances, with locally-serviceable query coverage rising from 23.2% to 71.3%. Third, local accelerators achieve at least 1.4x lower IPW than cloud accelerators running identical models, revealing significant headroom for local accelerator optimization. These findings demonstrate that local inference can meaningfully redistribute demand from centralized infrastructure for a substantial subset of queries, with IPW serving as the critical metric for tracking this transition.

cs.DC↗
arXiv2026

X-CoSD: Communication-Efficient Cross-Vocabulary Collaborative Speculative Decoding

This paper investigates collaborative speculative decoding (CoSD), a distributed large language model (LLM) inference framework in which an on-device small language model (SLM) drafts candidate tokens and a server LLM verifies them. Existing CoSD methods assume a shared vocabulary between the SLM and the LLM and incur substantial communication load because residual resampling requires token distribution exchange between the user device and the edge server. To address these limitations, we propose cross-vocabulary CoSD (X-CoSD), a lossless and communication-efficient CoSD framework for heterogeneous SLM-LLM vocabularies. X-CoSD is built on hybrid resampling (HR), which splits residual resampling across the common-vocabulary region on the device and the LLM-only region on the server, so that distribution transmission is required only for the common-vocabulary region. We further propose X-CoSD-E, an enhanced variant based on server resampling with device verification (SR-DV), in which the server sends only replacement candidates sampled from the server LLM and their corresponding probabilities for local verification at the device. We prove that both X-CoSD and X-CoSD-E preserve the server LLM distribution, and experiments show that they significantly improve token generation speed while maintaining generation quality comparable to that of the server LLM.

cs.CL↗
arXiv2026

Phase-cycled randomized benchmarking of quantum processors: recovering hidden classical noise correlations

Randomized benchmarking can hide classical temporal correlations because its Clifford-twirled response is even in the noise phase. For a stationary symmetric telegraph fluctuator, we show that continuous evolution and independent stationary resets at slot boundaries yield identical mean responses for arbitrary fixed idle modulations. We construct an eight-setting phase-cycle measurement of the connected sine-phase covariance under ideal Clifford twirling and classical idle dephasing. This observable vanishes for independent slot noise and fixed detuning without a weak-phase or Gaussian approximation. A closed telegraph response, independent circuit calculations and 800 simulation trials validate the construction and quantify the empirical coverage of a paired bootstrap estimator. A separate conservative confidence set states its finite-sample assumptions. Two acquisitions on an IBM processor compare engineered shared-sign and independently reset phases with identical marginals. Their primary contrasts are 0.254 and 0.211, with empirical 95% intervals [0.177, 0.331] and [0.136, 0.285], respectively; all negative-control intervals include zero. At equal shot and sensingwindow budgets, an ideal Ramsey/echo estimator is more precise in every tested class. The result supplies an explicit connection between a benchmarking identifiability limitation and a controlled correlation measurement. No native or quantum-memory detection is claimed.

cs.ET↗