arXiv ScienceSearch

arXiv · 2603.15168

Multimodal Connectome Fusion via Cross-Attention for Autism Spectrum Disorder Classification Using Graph Learning

Abstract

Autism spectrum disorder (ASD) is a complex neurodevelopmental condition characterized by atypical functional brain connectivity and subtle structural alterations. rs-fMRI has been widely used to identify disruptions in large-scale brain networks, while structural MRI provides complementary information about morphological organization. Despite their complementary nature, effectively integrating these heterogeneous imaging modalities within a unified framework remains challenging. This study proposes a multimodal graph learning framework that preserves the dominant role of functional connectivity while integrating structural imaging and phenotypic information for ASD classification. The proposed framework is evaluated on ABIDE-I dataset. Each subject is represented as a node within a population graph. Functional and structural features are extracted as modality-specific node attributes, while inter-subject relationships are modeled using a pairwise association encoder (PAE) based on phenotypic information. Two Edge Variational GCNs are trained to learn subject-level embeddings. To enable effective multimodal integration, we introduce a novel asymmetric transformer-based cross-attention mechanism that allows functional embeddings to selectively incorporate complementary structural information while preserving functional dominance. The fused embeddings are then passed to a MLP for ASD classification. Using stratified 10-fold cross-validation, the framework achieved an AUC of 87.3% and an accuracy of 84.4%. Under leave-one-site-out cross-validation (LOSO-CV), the model achieved an average cross-site accuracy of 82.0%, outperforming existing methods by approximately 3% under 10-fold cross-validation and 7% under LOSO-CV. The proposed framework effectively integrates heterogeneous multimodal data from the multi-site ABIDE-I dataset, improving automated ASD classification across imaging sites.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Ansar Rahman, Hassan Shojaee-Mend, Sepideh Hatamikia. 2026-03-16. Multimodal Connectome Fusion via Cross-Attention for Autism Spectrum Disorder Classification Using Graph Learning. https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.15168

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Privacy Leakage on DNNs: A Survey of Model Inversion Attacks and Defenses

Deep Neural Networks (DNNs) have revolutionized various domains with their exceptional performance across numerous applications. However, Model Inversion (MI) attacks, which disclose private information about the training dataset by abusing access to the trained models, have emerged as a formidable privacy threat. Given a trained network, these attacks enable adversaries to reconstruct high-fidelity data that closely aligns with the private training samples, posing significant privacy concerns. Despite the rapid advances in the field, we lack a comprehensive and systematic overview of existing MI attacks and defenses. To fill this gap, this paper thoroughly investigates this realm and presents a holistic survey. Firstly, our work briefly reviews early MI studies on traditional machine learning scenarios. We then elaborately analyze and compare numerous recent attacks and defenses on Deep Neural Networks (DNNs) across multiple modalities and learning tasks. By meticulously analyzing their distinctive features, we summarize and classify these methods into different categories and provide a novel taxonomy. Finally, this paper discusses promising research directions and presents potential solutions to open issues. To facilitate further study on MI attacks and defenses, we have implemented an open-source model inversion toolbox on GitHub (https://github.com/ffhibnese/Model-Inversion-Attack-ToolBox).

cs.CV

ALINA: Advanced Line Identification and Notation Algorithm

Labels are the cornerstone of supervised machine learning algorithms. Most visual recognition methods are fully supervised, using bounding boxes or pixel-wise segmentations for object localization. Traditional labeling methods, such as crowd-sourcing, are prohibitive due to cost, data privacy, amount of time, and potential errors on large datasets. To address these issues, we propose a novel annotation framework, Advanced Line Identification and Notation Algorithm (ALINA), which can be used for labeling taxiway datasets that consist of different camera perspectives and variable weather attributes (sunny and cloudy). Additionally, the CIRCular threshoLd pixEl Discovery And Traversal (CIRCLEDAT) algorithm has been proposed, which is an integral step in determining the pixels corresponding to taxiway line markings. Once the pixels are identified, ALINA generates corresponding pixel coordinate annotations on the frame. Using this approach, 60,249 frames from the taxiway dataset, AssistTaxi have been labeled. To evaluate the performance, a context-based edge map (CBEM) set was generated manually based on edge features and connectivity. The detection rate after testing the annotated labels with the CBEM set was recorded as 98.45%, attesting its dependability and effectiveness.

cs.CV

DisasterInsight: A Building-Centric Benchmark for Evaluating Vision--Language Models in Disaster Response

Vision--language models (VLMs) show promise for disaster-response remote sensing, but existing benchmarks mainly emphasize scene-level or damage-centric assessment. To study this building-centric gap, we introduce \method{}, a diagnostic benchmark built on xBD, a pre/post-disaster satellite dataset with building-level damage labels. \method{} enriches building instances with OpenStreetMap-derived functional labels and contains 134{,}108 task-specific instruction records across 15 task types, spanning instance-level assessment, scene-level counting, multi-instance reasoning, and structured report generation. The benchmark supports RGB pre/post-disaster imagery, single- and multi-view instance formulations, and scene-level RGB/SAR diagnostic inputs. Experiments with general-domain and remote-sensing VLMs show that models perform better on visible damage cues than on building-function understanding, multi-instance reasoning, counting, and grounded reporting. Instruction tuning improves performance on several tasks but does not close this building-centric gap.

cs.CV