arXiv Science⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2603.11624

An observer-based approach to the sorites paradox and the logic derived from that

Athanassios Tzouvaras
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

We approach the sorites paradox (SP) through an observer-based and time-dependent approach to truth of vague assertions. Formally the approach gives rise to a semantics, called fluxing-object semantics (FOS), because it involves models that contain ``fluxing objects'', that is, entities changing with time and observer. The models are equipped with agents (observers) and a linear and discrete time axis for time. The changing entities are represented by partial functions of time and agent, and this partiality causes truth-value gaps. If we interpret a truth-value gap as a third truth value, then FOS becomes a three-valued logic, which, quite interestingly, is proved identical to strong Kleene three-valued logic. The sorites phenomena can be represented in a structure of FOS as special objects that change imperceptibly with respect to an observer and with respect to a particular attribute. In this account the key point that eliminates the paradoxical character of sorites is the partiality of functions. When the observer is fixed the partiality corresponds to interrupted watching on his part. The interruption creates watching gaps during which the attributed property of the object as understood by the observer may change, without violating the imperceptibility condition. Interrupted watching has, according to experts on visual attention and focusing capabilities of humans, a firm physiological justification. The relationship of watching gaps with horizon crossing is also discussed.

Explore related subjects

math.LO

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Athanassios Tzouvaras. 2026-03-12. An observer-based approach to the sorites paradox and the logic derived from that. https://doi.org/10.1093/jigpal%2Fjzaf028

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

On Borel sets in ideal topologies

We study the Borel and analytic subsets of the spaces ${}^κκ$ and ${}^κ2$ endowed with ideal topologies, where $κ$ is a regular uncountable cardinal, thereby addressing some open problems of the literature. We provide a systematic analysis of the Borel hierarchy for an arbitrary ideal topology. In particular, we formulate a sufficient condition ensuring that the hierarchy does not collapse, demonstrate that every Borel set in such a topology is analytic, and establish the existence of a set that is not Borel. Our main result shows that, when the underlying ideal contains an unbounded subset, the collection of analytic sets coincides with the full power set of the ambient space. Finally, we prove that the Approximation Lemma holds in the setting of ideal topologies.

math.LO↗
arXiv2026

Inquisitive first-order logic is neither compact nor recursively axiomatizable

Inquisitive first-order logic is an extension of classical first-order logic with formulas regimenting first-order questions, such as "whether all objects are P", "which objects are P", and "what is one object that is P". Since it was first developed in 2009, two major meta-theoretical questions about this logic have remained open, in spite of significant efforts. The first concerns compactness: if a conclusion follows from a set of premises, does it always follow from some finite subset? The second concerns the computational status of validity: is the set of validities recursively enumerable, or equivalently, does the logic admit a recursive axiomatization? We settle both questions in the negative, showing that inquisitive first-order logic is neither compact nor recursively axiomatizable. Furthermore, we prove that it violates another signature property of first-order logic, namely, Craig interpolation. We discuss the significance of our results, and show how to extend them to a closely related logic, viz., inquisitive team logic.

math.LO↗
arXiv2026

The Borel Distinguishing Number of Schreier Graphs

The Borel distinguishing number $D_B(\mathcal{G})$ of a Borel graph $\mathcal{G}$, recently introduced by Bilge and Kaya, is the minimum number of colors required to break the symmetry of $\mathcal{G}$ in a Borel way. In this paper, we investigate the Borel distinguishing number of Schreier graphs induced by the free part of the shift action $Γ\curvearrowright n^Γ$. We prove that $D_B(\mathcal{G})\le n+1$ for $Γ=\mathbb{Z}^d$ equipped with the standard generators. Moreover, we show that $D_B(\mathcal{G})\ge n+1$ if $ Γ$ is amenable and $ \{γ\in \mathrm{Aut}(\mathrm{Cay}(Γ,S)) \mid γ(e) = e \}$ is non-trivial. We also show that $D_B(\mathcal{G})$ is finite if $Γ$ is finitely generated, and give some applications of our results. These results answer some questions raised by Bilge and Kaya.

math.LO↗