arXiv · 2602.11367
Interpretive Cultures: Resonance, randomness, and negotiated meaning for AI-assisted tarot divination
Abstract
While generative AI tools are increasingly adopted for creative and analytical tasks, their role in interpretive practices, where meaning is subjective, plural, and non-causal, remains poorly understood. This paper examines AI-assisted tarot reading, a divinatory practice in which users pose a query, draw cards through a randomized process, and ask AI systems to interpret the resulting symbols. Drawing on interviews with tarot practitioners and Hartmut Rosa's Theory of Resonance, we investigate how users seek, negotiate, and evaluate resonant interpretations in a context where no causal relationship exists between the query and the data being interpreted. We identify distinct ways practitioners incorporate AI into their interpretive workflows, including using AI to navigate uncertainty and self-doubt, explore alternative perspectives, and streamline or extend existing divinatory practices. Based on these findings, we offer design recommendations for AI systems that support interpretive meaning-making without collapsing ambiguity or foreclosing user agency.
Explore related subjects
Keep this discovery
Matthew Prock, Ziv Epstein, Hope Schroeder, Amy Smith, Cassandra Lee, Vana Goblot, Farnaz Jahanbakhsh. 2026-02-11. Interpretive Cultures: Resonance, randomness, and negotiated meaning for AI-assisted tarot divination. https://doi.org/10.1145/3772318.3791571
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.