arXiv Science⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2602.06857

On evaluating the measure of strong projections in infinite dimension

Miklos Ferenczi
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Projections of finite dimensional sets and their measures are investigated in infinite-dimensional power measure spaces. The starting point is the known algebraic formula, expressing \ the $y$-projection of a finite-dimensional set $a$ as a Boolean supremum of certain finite geometrical transformations of $a$ in the infinite-dimensional power space. This Boolean supremum somewhat unusual in classical measure theory because, it is different, in general, from the usual union of sets. The paper investigates the problem whether the power measure in the infinite-dimensional measure space is continuous with respect to the forementioned Boolean supremum. If so, then this continuity leads to a simple formula for calculating the measure of the projection of $a.$ It is shown that the answer concerning this continuity is affirmative for discrete measures but false for the Lebesgue measure, for example. However, it is proved that if the concept of the $y$-projection of $a$ is replaced by that of the so-called \textit{strong} $y$-\textit{projection} of $a,$ then the Lebesgue measure becomes continuous in this context and the value of the corresponding real supremum is exactly the measure of the foregoing strong $y $-projection. In this paper, the tools of the classical analysis are adapted to handle measures on Boolean algebras.

Explore related subjects

math.LO

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Miklos Ferenczi. 2026-02-06. On evaluating the measure of strong projections in infinite dimension. https://arxiv.org/abs/2602.06857

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

There is no maximal $K$-degree

The Kolmogorov complexity of a string characterize how complex it is to describe the string. If every prefix of a real $x$ is more complex to describe than every prefix (of the same length) of real $y$, then it is seen as $x$ is more complex to describe than $y$. It is wondered if there is a real $x$ so that no other reals are strictly more complex (to describe) than $x$. The behavior of Kolmogorov complexity functions generated by reals (namely $n\mapsto$ the minimal description length of the real) is quite chaos. Therefore, it is widely believed that there are many reals that are maximally complex to describe. For instance, it is conjectured that all random enough reals have maximal $K$-degree. In this paper, it is shown that there is no real with maximal $K$-degree. Actually, for almost all real $x$, we can uniformly computably find another real whose $K$-degree is strictly above $x$.

math.LO↗
arXiv2026

Quadruples and cubes

We prove, in $\mathsf{ZFC}$, that the $\lambda$-terraced cube relation fails whenever $\lambda$ is an uncountable cardinal. The corresponding terraced relation for quadruples fails for every $\lambda$. If $\lambda$ is $\aleph_0$ then the pretinent terraced relation has consistency strength of at least one Woodin cardinal. We prove positive polarized relations at a successor and a double successor from wondrous ideals. We show, however, that there are no such ideals over two consecutive cardinals simultaneously.

math.LO↗
arXiv2026

Possibilistic Logic over a Logic of Formal Inconsistency

In this article, we have introduced a new possibilistic logic on a logic of formal inconsistency with the aim of developing a possibility theoretic framework to deal with uncertainty and inconsistency meaningfully without leading to a system collapse. We have discussed the syntax and semantics for this logic and have proved the soundness and completeness theorems. A set of new measures of consistency, contradictoriness, and triviality of a set of formulas have been defined. These have then been put to use in an example to show that this framework can provide better means of machine reasoning.

math.LO↗