arXiv ScienceSearch

arXiv · 2602.06737

Optimized Piecewise Affine Abstractions of Neural Networks with Learnable Activation Functions

Abstract

We present a generalized framework for the range verification of neural networks featuring non-linear activation functions. Our approach first constructs an ``optimized piecewise affine abstraction" of the network that replaces each non-linear activation function by a piecewise affine (PWA) function plus a bounded error. Such PWA functions are readily amenable to existing neural network verification techniques using specializations of linear arithmetic SMT solvers and mixed-integer optimization approaches. However, there are infinitely many ways to abstract each node, with a natural tradeoff between the number of pieces used, the global error bound, and the complexity of the resulting verification problem. We propose a dynamic programming (DP) algorithm to systematically compute the optimized PWA abstraction for general activation functions, guaranteeing tighter output bounds. The algorithm combines a local DP approximation at each node with a global error bound, yielding a variant of the knapsack problem for deciding how to allocate a fixed budget on the total number of pieces across units so as to minimize the worst-case error bound between the network and its approximation. Although the knapsack problem is itself NP-hard, we can use pseudo-polynomial DP algorithms as well as approximation schemes to solve it efficiently. Crucially, our approach is broadly applicable to diverse networks consisting of non-linear activations, including standard Multi-Layer Perceptrons (MLPs) and recently proposed architectures such as Kolmogorov-Arnold Networks (KANs). Over a series of KAN benchmarks spanning 20 to 22,000 parameters, our approach yields output bounds that are consistently of smaller width than uniform PWA allocation. The overall time taken is roughly comparable while the overhead for computing the optimized abstraction is subsumed by the time taken to compute output bounds.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Noah Schwartz, Chandra Kanth Nagesh, Sriram Sankaranarayanan, Ramneet Kaur, Tuhin Sahai, Susmit Jha. 2026-02-06. Optimized Piecewise Affine Abstractions of Neural Networks with Learnable Activation Functions. https://arxiv.org/abs/2602.06737

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

AUC Maximization from Biased Positive-unlabeled Data with Confidence

Maximizing the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) is a standard approach to imbalanced binary classification. Although positive and negative data are required for maximizing the AUC, negative data are often difficult to collect in some real-world applications due to privacy concerns or the need for specialized expertise to annotate them. Thus, AUC maximization from positive and unlabeled (PU) data has been attracting attention. Existing methods assume that labeled positive data are unbiased samples from the true positive distribution. However, this ideal assumption is often violated in practice. In this paper, we propose a method to maximize the AUC from biased PU data. To address the bias, our key idea is to exploit {\it confidence}, i.e., the probability that an instance is positive, associated with the small number of labeled positive data. We derive an estimator of the AUC risk using biased PU data with confidence, enabling AUC maximization under such bias. We further show that the rewritten AUC risk induces a Bayes-optimal AUC ranking even when the available confidence is any strictly increasing transformation of the true posterior probability. We experimentally show the effectiveness of our method on eight real-world datasets.

cs.LG

Measuring the Value of World-Model Updates: A Counterfactual Utility Protocol for Continual Adaptation

Continual world models must decide whether new data justify changing the model. Fixed replay schedules and prediction-error triggers specify when to update, but neither reveals the value of an individual update: one deployment run cannot show how the same model would have performed at that moment had it held its parameters. We introduce the fork ledger, which branches a deployment stream at pre-registered decision points into matched update and hold continuations under common random numbers. It evaluates both continuations on the same episodes and records $\Delta R = R_{\mathrm{update}} - R_{\mathrm{hold}}$. Always applying one fixed update mechanism lowers return on all three simulated control tasks: CartPole ($-144.0$; checkpoint-bootstrap $95\%$ CI $[-185.4,-116.1]$, against a converged return near $650$), Walker ($-82.8$; $[-101.1,-61.7]$) and Cheetah ($-18.6$; $[-29.0,-6.6]$). Divergence is an outcome of applying the update, so the estimand counts every attempted fork; restricted to the $693$ of $720$ that did not collapse, CartPole and Walker are unchanged in sign ($-113.4$ and $-82.1$) and Cheetah becomes unresolved ($-3.9$; $[-17.5,+13.0]$). The task is the unit of inference: each contributes $240$ attempted forks over five pretrained checkpoints crossed with two drift directions. The ledger makes counterfactual utility observable for a fixed mechanism, allowing triggers to be judged by the updates they select rather than by surprise detection alone.

cs.LG

When More Is Not Better: Component Anti-Synergy in a P300 Speller

P300 brain-computer interface (BCI) spellers can provide hands-free communication for people with severe motor impairments. Modern pipelines combine multiple individually promising components, often assuming that 'more-is-better'. We tested this assumption using a four-component full-factorial experiment varying the inclusion of Euclidean Alignment (EA), xDAWN spatial filtering, subject calibration, and language model priors on a public P300 dataset. Performance was evaluated using accuracy, repetitions, and information transfer rate (ITR) with mixed-effects models. Results show that the value of components is conditional rather than additive. Calibration was the strongest singular contributor, while EA compensated for its absence in zero-calibration settings. Adding independently useful components could also reduce performance, revealing component anti-synergy. Contrary to conventional wisdom, LM support was not universally beneficial: its effect depends strongly on the strength of the underlying EEG pipeline, while results from a larger LM showed a similar pattern. Together, these findings challenge maximal 'all-on' pipeline design and highlight the value of selecting spatial and language-support components according to the quality of available EEG evidence.

cs.LG