arXiv · 2602.04355
Can Vision Replace Text in Working Memory? Evidence from Spatial n-Back in Vision-Language Models
Abstract
Working memory is a central component of intelligent behavior, providing a dynamic workspace for maintaining and updating task-relevant information. Recent work has used n-back tasks to probe working-memory-like behavior in large language models, but it is unclear whether the same probe elicits comparable computations when information is carried in a visual rather than textual code in vision-language models. We evaluate Qwen2.5 and Qwen2.5-VL on a controlled spatial n-back task presented as matched text-rendered or image-rendered grids. Across conditions, models show reliably higher accuracy and d' with text than with vision. To interpret these differences at the process level, we use trial-wise log-probability evidence and find that nominal 2/3-back often fails to reflect the instructed lag and instead aligns with a recency-locked comparison. We further show that grid size alters recent-repeat structure in the stimulus stream, thereby changing interference and error patterns. These results motivate computation-sensitive interpretations of multimodal working memory.
Explore related subjects
Keep this discovery
Sichu Liang, Hongyu Zhu, Wenwen Wang, Deyu Zhou. 2026-02-04. Can Vision Replace Text in Working Memory? Evidence from Spatial n-Back in Vision-Language Models. https://arxiv.org/abs/2602.04355
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.