ASRI: An Aggregated Systemic Risk Index for Cryptocurrency Markets

Murad Farzulla; Andrew Maksakov

Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2602.03874

ASRI: An Aggregated Systemic Risk Index for Cryptocurrency Markets

Murad Farzulla·Andrew Maksakov

View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Cryptocurrency markets exceed USD 3 trillion in capitalisation, yet practitioners lack an interpretable, channel-decomposed composite for characterising crypto-native systemic stress. We introduce the Aggregated Systemic Risk Index (ASRI), built from four weighted sub-indices -- Stablecoin Concentration Risk (30%), DeFi Liquidity Risk (25%), Contagion Risk (25%, implemented as a TradFi-stress proxy), and Regulatory Opacity Risk (20%) -- with a Diebold--Yilmaz connectedness series computed on the sub-indices as network benchmark. We evaluate ASRI retrospectively against four crises (Terra/Luna, Celsius/3AC, FTX, SVB) and give a methodological account of how autocorrelation- and block-structure-robust inference reshapes apparent crisis-detection strength. The event-study signal is inconclusive: heavily serially correlated (AR(1) $\approx 0.8$--$0.9$), with placebo dates clearing the nominal threshold as often as crises. Fixed-threshold detection flags three of four events with $\approx$19-day average lead ($\approx$5 days under a responsive specification); walk-forward thresholds flag 4/4 but at high false-positive cost -- evidence against look-ahead bias, not a clean prediction record. ASRI's day-level discrimination (AUROC 0.866) beats only the circular D--Y comparator (0.670); it is statistically indistinguishable from its strongest sub-index (0.851), PC1 (0.858), and a standalone VIX series (0.875, $p=0.58$). We read aggregation's value as interpretive -- channel attribution, lead time, and regime structure in one auditable composite -- not as discriminative gain. With four crisis events the binding power limit, ASRI is a transparent, reproducible, retrospective monitoring framework targeting crypto-native vulnerabilities that SRISK and CoVaR are not built to capture, not a validated early-warning system. Out of sample it classifies the 2025 Bybit hack as non-systemic.

Explore related subjects

q-fin.RM q-fin.CP

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeX RIS

Murad Farzulla, Andrew Maksakov. 2026-07-11. ASRI: An Aggregated Systemic Risk Index for Cryptocurrency Markets. https://arxiv.org/abs/2602.03874

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Quantifying the 2027 Solvency II Risk Margin Reform

The 2027 Solvency II reform recalibrates the Risk Margin by reducing the prescribed cost-of-capital rate from 6% to 4.75% and introducing a time-dependent attenuation of future Solvency Capital Requirements. This paper develops an analytical and numerical framework for characterizing the effect of the final regulatory calibration. By normalizing discounted projected capital requirements into a probability distribution over run-off time, we obtain an exact representation of the ratio between the revised and previous Risk Margins. The framework yields sharp universal and horizon-specific bounds, characterizes the effect of later capital timing through stochastic dominance, and shows that mean run-off time alone does not determine the reform effect when temporal dispersion varies. Additional bounds are derived conditional on mean run-off time and horizon. Conditional on a given projected SCR path, the mechanical reduction lies between 20.83% and 60.42%. For proportional Best Estimate projections, an exact covariance decomposition identifies how departures from proportionality affect the relative reform ratio. Holding the projected SCR path fixed, the revised formula has a lower direct interest-rate semi-elasticity than the previous calibration. A reduced-form stochastic extension further quantifies convexity effects arising from uncertainty in capital persistence. Numerical applications reconstruct Risk Margin calculations from published actuarial run-off profiles and complement them with controlled long-horizon, interest-rate, and persistence experiments. The results show that the reform effect is governed by the temporal structure of future capital and provide tractable tools for assessing projected capital profiles, Risk Margin simplifications, and direct discount-rate sensitivity.

q-fin.RM↗

arXiv2026

Towards foundation models for insurance risk modelling

Claim narratives, images and sensor data contain information about insured risks that is difficult to use through existing actuarial models. Foundation models learn patterns from large datasets before being adapted to particular tasks. By turning these high-dimensional sources into variables or numerical representations, they could help insurers use more of the information they already collect, potentially reducing the experience needed to develop each application. For example, a language model could identify a worsening injury in a new claim note, allowing a reserving model to recognise the change in expected cost before the payments reveal the deterioration. In this paper, we review language, vision, geospatial, time series, tabular and scientific models, explaining existing insurance applications and potential future uses. Scientific models extend this approach to future weather and climate conditions: their simulations can inform loss estimates once local hazards are linked to asset damage, repair costs and insurance coverage. We propose a process to connect these model outputs to actuarial calculations and to assess their predictive contribution, stability and compliance with rules on information use. Evaluating these applications is difficult when final claim costs become known only after long delays, large losses are rare or patterns learned elsewhere fail to transfer to the target portfolio. Richer data can reveal private information and support finer risk classification, which can change access to insurance. Reusing the same models across insurers also creates dependence on shared predictions and providers.

q-fin.RM↗

arXiv2026

Forecasting Liquidity Withdraw with Machine Learning Models

Liquidity withdrawal is a critical indicator of market fragility. In this project, I test a framework for forecasting liquidity withdrawal at the individual-stock level, ranging from less liquid stocks to highly liquid large-cap tickers, and evaluate the relative performance of competing model classes in predicting short-horizon order book stress. We introduce the Liquidity Withdrawal Index (LWI) -- defined as the ratio of order cancellations to the sum of standing depth and new additions at the best quotes -- as a bounded, interpretable measure of transient liquidity removal. Using Nasdaq market-by-order (MBO) data, we compare a spectrum of approaches: linear benchmarks (AR, HAR), and non-linear tree ensembles (XGBoost), across horizons ranging from 250\,ms to 5\,s. Beyond predictive accuracy, our results provide insights into order placement and cancellation dynamics, identify regimes where linear versus non-linear signals dominate, and highlight how early-warning indicators of liquidity withdrawal can inform both market surveillance and execution.

q-fin.RM↗