arXiv ScienceSearch

arXiv · 2602.03436

The Complexity of Maximal/Closed Frequent Tree Mining for Bounded Height Trees

Abstract

Frequent tree mining asks us to enumerate tree patterns that occur frequently in a database of rooted trees. This problem is motivated by tree-structured data in bioinformatics, such as glycans and pseudoknot-free RNA secondary structures. A direct enumeration of all frequent trees is often highly redundant, because every subtree of a frequent tree is again frequent. Closed and maximal frequent trees are standard ways to reduce this redundancy, but their enumeration can still be computationally hard. In this paper, we study the effect of bounding the height of the input trees. This is a natural restriction for rooted trees, since the height is the depth of the hierarchy. We ask whether closed/maximal frequent tree mining remains hard when every input tree has a small height. Our results show that the answer depends sharply on the model. For rooted unordered trees of height at most 2, we give a polynomial-delay algorithm for enumerating closed frequent trees. On the other hand, for rooted ordered trees of height at most 2, we show that an output-polynomial time algorithm for enumerating closed frequent trees would imply an output-polynomial time algorithm for Dualization. For maximal frequent tree enumeration, we prove that no output-polynomial time algorithm exists unless P = NP already for rooted ordered trees of height at most 2 and for rooted unordered trees of height at most 3. Thus, even very small height bounds do not make the enumeration problems easy in general. At the same time, the unordered closed case of height at most 2 admits polynomial-delay enumeration. These results give a height-based classification of the complexity of closed and maximal frequent tree mining on shallow rooted trees.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Kenta Komoto, Kazuhiro Kurita, Hirotaka Ono. 2026-02-03. The Complexity of Maximal/Closed Frequent Tree Mining for Bounded Height Trees. https://arxiv.org/abs/2602.03436

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS