arXiv · 2601.21739
Why $β_1 = β_2$ Is Dynamically Special in Adam
Abstract
Adam has been at the core of large-scale training for almost a decade, yet the role of its two momentum parameters remains poorly understood. Recent work shows that tying $β_{1}=β_{2}$ can preserve Adam's strong performance despite collapsing two memory scales into one, raising a basic question: what becomes dynamically special when the memories are tied? We identify a concrete mechanism. In the continuous-time limit, each normalized-update coordinate decomposes into a sign component, an explicit magnitude-lag term proportional to the difference between the two memory times, and additional transition, curvature, and nonlinear ratio terms. This lag channel vanishes exactly when $β_{1}=β_{2}$, making the diagonal the unique regime in which this mismatch-induced response is structurally absent. A full-history discrete decomposition on real training gradients recovers this change in composition: tied updates are sign-dominated, whereas the lag term becomes substantial off the diagonal and leaves a comparatively small residual. Across six vision and language tasks, tied configurations also typically exhibit smoother update-norm trajectories. Overall, our results identify memory-scale mismatch as a concrete source of magnitude sensitivity in Adam and provide a mechanistic account of why tied momentum is dynamically distinctive.
Explore related subjects
Keep this discovery
Explore connections, maps & timelines
Alberto Fernández-Hernández, Cristian Pérez-Corral, Jose I. Mestre, Manuel F. Dolz, Enrique S. Quintana-Ortí. 2026-09-17. Why $β_1 = β_2$ Is Dynamically Special in Adam. https://arxiv.org/abs/2601.21739
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.