arXiv Science⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2601.19049

A class of skew-multivariate distributions for spatial data

Pavel Krupskii
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

This paper introduces a class of copula models for spatial data, based on multivariate Pareto-mixture distributions. We explore the tail properties of these models, demonstrating their ability to capture both tail dependence and asymptotic independence, as well as the tail asymmetry frequently observed in real-world data. The proposed models also offer flexibility in accounting for permutation asymmetry and can effectively represent both the bulk and extreme tails of the distribution. We consider special cases of these models with computationally tractable likelihoods and present an extensive simulation study to assess the finite-sample performance of the maximum likelihood estimators. Finally, we apply our models to analyze a temperature dataset, showcasing their practical utility.

Explore related subjects

stat.ME

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Pavel Krupskii. 2026-01-27. A class of skew-multivariate distributions for spatial data. https://arxiv.org/abs/2601.19049

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Functional BART with Shape Priors: A Bayesian Tree Approach to Constrained Functional Regression

Motivated by the remarkable success of Bayesian additive regression trees (BART) in regression modelling, we propose a novel nonparametric Bayesian method, termed Functional BART (FBART), tailored specifically for function-on-scalar regression. FBART leverages spline-based representations for functional responses coupled with a flexible tree-based partitioning structure, effectively capturing complex and heterogeneous relationships between response curves and scalar predictors. To facilitate efficient posterior inference, we develop a customized Bayesian backfitting algorithm. Additionally, we extend FBART by introducing shape constraints (e.g., monotonicity or convexity) on the response curves, enabling enhanced estimation and prediction when prior shape information is available. The use of shape priors ensures that posterior samples respect the specified functional constraints. Under mild regularity conditions, we establish posterior convergence rates for both FBART and its shape-constrained variant, demonstrating rate adaptivity to unknown smoothness. Extensive simulation studies and analyses of two real datasets illustrate the superior estimation accuracy and predictive performance of our proposed methods compared to existing state-of-the-art alternatives.

stat.ME↗
arXiv2026

An integer programming-based approach to construct exact two-sample binomial tests with maximum power

Comparing binomial proportions is a foundational task in clinical trials; however, practitioners often use a liberal likelihood-based test or the conservative Fisher's exact test. To increase power without sacrificing validity, we use a linear integer program to construct finite-sample exact binomial tests with maximum power. Our proposed Average Power Knapsack (APK) test finds a decision boundary that maximizes average power, guaranteeing it cannot uniformly be improved in terms of power, while enforcing type I error rate control across the null hypothesis parameter space using Lipschitz continuity. Our numerical evaluation reveals consistent pointwise power gains of up to 35% for the APK test over Fisher's exact test, as well as systematic power improvements over state-of-the-art exact Berger and Boos implementations of the mid-p-value and Z-pooled tests. When compared against non-exact procedures exhibiting moderate type I error rate inflation, the exact APK test maintains comparable power. For sample sizes where APK construction becomes computationally intensive, Fisher's mid-p-value test emerges as the best non-exact alternative. To support practical application, we developed an interactive R Shiny tool that enables seamless implementation of our optimized exact tests for binomial proportions.

stat.ME↗
arXiv2026

On the limitations of causal inference with current-treatment Cox models

Cox models with time-varying treatments often include only the current treatment level. Translating such a model into causally meaningful intervention-specific survival probabilities relies on the Markov property: that the hazard is independent of treatment history conditional on current treatment. For the Markov property to not be population-specific, it needs to hold also conditional on any unmeasured prognostic heterogeneity (frailty). Using a discrete-time argument, earlier work concluded that the Markov property can hold both conditionally and marginally only in the absence of a treatment effect or an effect of the unmeasured heterogeneity. We broaden this argument by developing a continuous-time framework that encompasses both proposed extensions of the Kaplan-Meier curve and current-treatment marginal structural Cox models, and sharpen it by characterizing precisely the conditions under which the Markov property can hold both conditionally and marginally. Specifically, we show that it requires the absence of treatment-frailty interaction on the additive hazard scale. As frailty is inherently unmeasured, such a no-interaction assumption cannot be verified. Consequently, causal interpretation of a current-treatment marginal structural Cox model rests on a strong and unverifiable structural assumption. Illustrating this point, we construct a setting in which a Cox model is correctly specified conditionally on current treatment only, although the marginal Markov property fails. Transforming the fitted model to the survival scale does not recover the true intervention-specific survival probabilities. Thus, moving from the hazard scale to the survival scale is not in itself sufficient to obtain a causal interpretation in the time-varying treatment setting.

stat.ME↗