arXiv ScienceSearch

arXiv · 2601.14810

Learning and extrapolating scale-invariant processes

Abstract

Machine Learning (ML) has deeply changed some fields recently, like Language and Vision and we may expect it to be relevant also to the analysis of of complex systems. Here we want to tackle the question of how and to which extent can one regress scale-free processes, i.e. processes displaying power law behavior, like earthquakes or avalanches? We are interested in predicting the large ones, i.e. rare events in the training set which therefore require extrapolation capabilities of the model. For this we consider two paradigmatic problems that are statistically self-similar. The first one is a 2-dimensional fractional Gaussian field obeying linear dynamics, self-similar by construction and amenable to exact analysis. The second one is the Abelian sandpile model, exhibiting self-organized criticality. The emerging paradigm of Geometric Deep Learning shows that including known symmetries into the model's architecture is key to success. Here one may hope to extrapolate only by leveraging scale invariance. This is however a peculiar symmetry, as it involves possibly non-trivial coarse-graining operations and anomalous scaling. We perform experiments on various existing architectures like U-net, Riesz network (scale invariant by construction), or our own proposals: a wavelet-decomposition based Graph Neural Network (with discrete scale symmetry), a Fourier embedding layer and a Fourier-Mellin Neural Operator. Based on these experiments and a complete characterization of the linear case, we identify the main issues relative to spectral biases and coarse-grained representations, and discuss how to alleviate them with the relevant inductive biases.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Anaclara Alvez-Canepa, Cyril Furtlehner, François P. Landes. 2026-09-02. Learning and extrapolating scale-invariant processes. https://doi.org/10.1103/n1nt-spjp

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

Discover connections

Connections use source metadata and explicit phrase matches, not verified experimental comparisons.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Percolation Dynamics in Optimization : Variance Cascades and Discrete Scale Invariance

We study the dynamics of Stochastic Gradient Descent (SGD), which is known to steer deep neural networks toward invariant sets that correspond to simpler subnetworks. How this steering unfolds over time remains poorly understood. We answer this by modeling the stochastic gradient flow (SGF) as a percolation process, in which architectural symmetries force subnetworks to merge in discrete simultaneous blocks rather than one at a time. These structural transitions register as variance spikes in a macroscopic order parameter, echoing physical phase transitions. We further show this trapping mechanism and its associated scaling cascade extend to Adam and AdamW under an explicit heavy-tailed noise model.

cs.LG

Shortcomings and capacities of real-constrained neural networks in complex spaces

We find the asymptotic ratio between the storage capacities when enforcing real pre-activations in a complex hypothesis class as opposed to complex ones in the same class. We use weights drawn from the complex Gaussian, which converge asymptotically in norm to the square root of dimension almost surely. Our methods depend on Gardner volume-type comparisons at critical capacity. Our proof relies on an application of the Harish-Chandra-Itzykson-Zuber (HCIZ) formula, nonstandard in literature. With the HCIZ formula, we may obtain a more robust approximation for the final asymptotic ratio. This strategy is applicable to our work specifically since we integrate over the unitary and orthogonal compact manifolds, facilitated via the Weyl integration formula and the Haar measure.

cs.LG

On the Existence of Consistent Adversarial Attacks in High-Dimensional Linear Classification

What fundamentally distinguishes an adversarial attack from a misclassification due to limited model expressivity or finite data? In this work, we investigate this question in the setting of high-dimensional binary classification, where statistical effects due to limited data availability play a central role. We introduce a new error metric that precisely capture this distinction, quantifying model vulnerability to consistent adversarial attacks -- perturbations that preserve the ground-truth labels. Our main technical contribution is an exact and rigorous asymptotic characterization of these metrics in both well-specified models and latent space models, revealing different vulnerability patterns compared to standard robust error measures. The theoretical results demonstrate that as models become more overparameterized, their vulnerability to label-preserving perturbations grows, offering theoretical insight into the mechanisms underlying model sensitivity to adversarial attacks.

stat.ML