arXiv ScienceSearch

arXiv · 2601.12439

Disjoint non-forking amalgamation in stable AECs

Abstract

The disjoint amalgamation property (DAP), which asserts that all spans of a class of models can be amalgamated with minimal intersection, is an important property in the context of abstract elementary classes, with connections to both Grossberg's question and Shelah's categoricity conjecture. We prove that, in a nice AEC $\mathbf{K}$ stable in $\lambda \geq \operatorname{LS}(\mathbf{K})$ with a strong enough independence relation, all high cofinality $\lambda$-limit models are disjoint (non-forking) amalgamation bases. $\textbf{Theorem.}$ Let $\mathbf{K}$ be an AEC stable in $\lambda$, where $\mathbf{K}_\lambda$ has AP, JEP, and NMM, and let $\mathbf{K}'$ be some AC where $\mathbf{K}_{(\lambda,\geq\kappa)} \subseteq \mathbf{K}' \subseteq \mathbf{K}_\lambda$. Suppose there is an independence relation on $\mathbf{K}'$ satisfying uniqueness, existence, non-forking amalgamation, $\mathbf{K}_{(\lambda,\geq\kappa)}$-universal continuity* in $\mathbf{K}_\lambda$, and $(\geq \kappa)$-local character. Assume $M_0, M_1, M_2 \in \mathbf{K}_{(\lambda,\geq\kappa)}$, and that $M_0 \leq_{\mathbf{K}} M_l$ and $a_l \in M_l$ for $l = 1, 2$. Then there exist $N \in \mathbf{K}_{(\lambda,\geq\kappa)}$ and $f_l : M_l \rightarrow N$ fixing $M_0$ for $l = 1, 2$ such that $\operatorname{gtp}(f_l(a_l)/f_{3-l}[M_{3-l}], N)$ does not fork over $M_0$ and $f_1[M_1] \cap f_2[M_2] = M_0$. That is, our independence relation has disjoint non-forking amalgamation in $\mathbf{K}_{(\lambda,\geq\kappa)}$. In particular, every $M_0 \in \mathbf{K}_{(\lambda,\geq\kappa)}$ is a disjoint amalgamation base in $\mathbf{K}_\lambda$. The hypotheses on the independence relation can be weakened (closer to $\lambda$-non-splitting in $\lambda$-stable AECs) if we are willing to give up the `non-forking' conditions of the amalgamation.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Jeremy Beard. 2026-01-18. Disjoint non-forking amalgamation in stable AECs. https://arxiv.org/abs/2601.12439

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

There is no maximal $K$-degree

The Kolmogorov complexity of a string characterize how complex it is to describe the string. If every prefix of a real $x$ is more complex to describe than every prefix (of the same length) of real $y$, then it is seen as $x$ is more complex to describe than $y$. It is wondered if there is a real $x$ so that no other reals are strictly more complex (to describe) than $x$. The behavior of Kolmogorov complexity functions generated by reals (namely $n\mapsto$ the minimal description length of the real) is quite chaos. Therefore, it is widely believed that there are many reals that are maximally complex to describe. For instance, it is conjectured that all random enough reals have maximal $K$-degree. In this paper, it is shown that there is no real with maximal $K$-degree. Actually, for almost all real $x$, we can uniformly computably find another real whose $K$-degree is strictly above $x$.

math.LO

Quadruples and cubes

We prove, in $\mathsf{ZFC}$, that the $\lambda$-terraced cube relation fails whenever $\lambda$ is an uncountable cardinal. The corresponding terraced relation for quadruples fails for every $\lambda$. If $\lambda$ is $\aleph_0$ then the pretinent terraced relation has consistency strength of at least one Woodin cardinal. We prove positive polarized relations at a successor and a double successor from wondrous ideals. We show, however, that there are no such ideals over two consecutive cardinals simultaneously.

math.LO

Possibilistic Logic over a Logic of Formal Inconsistency

In this article, we have introduced a new possibilistic logic on a logic of formal inconsistency with the aim of developing a possibility theoretic framework to deal with uncertainty and inconsistency meaningfully without leading to a system collapse. We have discussed the syntax and semantics for this logic and have proved the soundness and completeness theorems. A set of new measures of consistency, contradictoriness, and triviality of a set of formulas have been defined. These have then been put to use in an example to show that this framework can provide better means of machine reasoning.

math.LO