arXiv ScienceSearch

arXiv · 2601.08106

Delaunay Triangulations with Predictions

Abstract

We investigate algorithms with predictions in computational geometry, specifically focusing on the basic problem of computing 2D Delaunay triangulations. Given a set $P$ of $n$ points in the plane and a triangulation $G$ that serves as a "prediction" of the Delaunay triangulation, we would like to use $G$ to compute the correct Delaunay triangulation $\textit{DT}(P)$ more quickly when $G$ is "close" to $\textit{DT}(P)$. We obtain a variety of results of this type, under different deterministic and probabilistic settings, including the following: 1. Define $D$ to be the number of edges in $G$ that are not in $\textit{DT}(P)$. We present a deterministic algorithm to compute $\textit{DT}(P)$ from $G$ in $O(n + D\log^3 n)$ time, and a randomized algorithm in $O(n+D\log n)$ expected time, the latter of which is optimal in terms of $D$. 2. Let $R$ be a random subset of the edges of $\textit{DT}(P)$, where each edge is chosen independently with probability $\rho$. Suppose $G$ is any triangulation of $P$ that contains $R$. We present an algorithm to compute $\textit{DT}(P)$ from $G$ in $O(n\log\log n + n\log(1/\rho))$ time with high probability. 3. Define $d_{\mbox{\scriptsize\rm vio}}$ to be the maximum number of points of $P$ strictly inside the circumcircle of a triangle in $G$ (the number is 0 if $G$ is equal to $\textit{DT}(P)$). We present a deterministic algorithm to compute $\textit{DT}(P)$ from $G$ in $O(n\log^*n + n\log d_{\mbox{\scriptsize\rm vio}})$ time. We also obtain results in similar settings for related problems such as 2D Euclidean minimum spanning trees, and hope that our work will open up a fruitful line of future research.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Sergio Cabello, Timothy M. Chan, Panos Giannopoulos. 2026-01-13. Delaunay Triangulations with Predictions. https://arxiv.org/abs/2601.08106

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Almost Linear Universal Point Sets for Planar Graphs

A point set is universal for planar graphs on $n$ vertices if every such graph has a straight-line drawing without crossings whose vertices belong to the set. We construct universal point sets of size $n^{1+o(1)}$, improving the previous quadratic upper bound. Our construction uses the reduction of Bannister, Cheng, Devanny, and Eppstein from universal point sets to superpatterns for $213$-avoiding permutations. We represent these permutations by ordered rooted forests and construct a small family of intervals containing every such forest. The result follows from a straightforward bound on the size of the family of intervals. GPT-6 Astra assisted in developing the construction and proof.

cs.CG

Some results on Archdeacon's conjecture for rotation systems

A rotation system on $n$ elements assigns to each element a cyclic order of the other $n-1$ elements. A four-element subset is non-planar if its induced rotation system cannot be realized by a crossing-free drawing of $K_4$. As a combinatorial strengthening of Hill's conjecture on the crossing number of the complete graph, Archdeacon conjectured that every rotation system on $n$ elements has at least $H(n)=\frac{1}{4} \lfloor\frac {n}{2}\rfloor \lfloor\frac{n-1}{2}\rfloor \lfloor\frac{n-2}{2}\rfloor \lfloor\frac{n-3}{2}\rfloor$ non-planar four-element subsets. We computationally verify Archdeacon's conjecture for $n\leq 10$ and show that every extremal rotation system in these orders is realizable by a simple drawing. With computer assistance, we prove that every rotation system on $n$ elements has at least $(8/9 - o(1)) H(n)$ non-planar four-element subsets. We also present a proof by hand for a weaker lower bound of $(2/3-o(1)) H(n)$. Finally, extending recent work of Felsner on antipodal pairs in drawings, we show that Archdeacon's conjecture holds for antipodally shellable rotation systems.

cs.CG

The Hyperbolic Surface Distance, Diameter, and Dirichlet Problems

Despite the prominence of hyperbolic surfaces in mathematics, basic algorithmic questions about them, even computing the distance between two points, have remained open, leaving many features of these surfaces inaccessible. The classical machinery assumes a polyhedral structure absent on a smooth surface. We remove these obstacles. We begin with an efficient $O(g^2)$ algorithm for the distance between two points, where $g$ is the genus of the surface. Building on it, we obtain an $O(g^2 \log g)$ method for answering distance queries from a fixed source and, as a consequence, for recentering a Dirichlet domain around an arbitrary point. This understanding of distances on the surface then lets us approximate the diameter to within any $\eps$ in time $O(g^3 \log g / \eps^2)$. We further show that the diameter, a single real number encoding a great deal about the surface, is exactly computable. Its hyperbolic cosine is an algebraic number over the field encoding the coefficients of the hyperbolic isometries defining the surface.

cs.CG