arXiv Science⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2601.08026

FigEx2: Visual-Conditioned Panel Detection and Captioning for Scientific Compound Figures

Jifeng Song·Arun Das·Pan Wang·Hui Ji·Kun Zhao·Yufei Huang
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Scientific compound figures combine multiple labeled panels into a single image, and downstream pretraining and retrieval require panel-aligned visual-text pairs. However, in a PubMed Central (PMC)-scale crawl of 346,567 compound figures, 16.3% have no caption and are discarded by existing caption-decomposition pipelines. We propose FigEx2, a visual-conditioned framework that takes only a compound figure as input and jointly produces labeled panel boxes and panel-wise captions. FigEx2 introduces an Entity-Attention Kullback-Leibler (KL) regularizer that aligns the detector's cross-attention with scientific entities annotated for each panel, providing a stable conditioning signal that also improves localization, and applies Group Relative Policy Optimization (GRPO) with a panel-level Entity-F1 reward to optimize scientific faithfulness. We curate BioSci-Fig-Cap for in-domain supervision and contribute physics and chemistry test suites for cross-disciplinary evaluation. FigEx2 achieves 0.751 mAP@0.5:0.95 on BioSci-Fig-Cap, and outperforms Qwen3-VL-8B by 6.80 Entity-F1 on MedICaT for captioning. It also transfers zero-shot to out-of-distribution domains. The source code is available at https://github.com/Huang-AI4Medicine-Lab/FigEx2.

Explore related subjects

cs.CVcs.AIcs.CL

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Jifeng Song, Arun Das, Pan Wang, Hui Ji, Kun Zhao, Yufei Huang. 2026-09-05. FigEx2: Visual-Conditioned Panel Detection and Captioning for Scientific Compound Figures. https://arxiv.org/abs/2601.08026

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

Discover connections

cs.AI subjectcs.CL subjectcs.CV subject

Connections use source metadata and explicit phrase matches, not verified experimental comparisons.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Visual Framing for News Stance Detection via Image Generation

Article-level news stance detection aims to identify the perspective of news articles toward social issues. Despite advances in stance detection and its importance for trustworthy media environments, news articles pose distinct challenges because their stances are often implicit, subtly conveyed through journalistic framing, and embedded in long, structurally complex texts. To address these challenges, we introduce VFStance, which leverages visual framing to make implicit stance cues more explicit via image generation. In evaluation experiments, we demonstrate the effectiveness of VFStance over existing methods and the contribution of visual framing to its performance. Finally, a controlled user study (N=200) in a snippet-based news consumption setting further demonstrates that VFStance can make stance signals visually salient and highlights its potential use beyond automated stance detection.

cs.CL↗
arXiv2026

PetQA: Benchmarking Veterinary Knowledge and Clinical Reasoning

We introduce PetQA, a Korean long-form question-answering (QA) benchmark for evaluating veterinary knowledge and clinical reasoning in large language models (LLMs) and large vision-language models (LVLMs). PetQA contains 10,076 text-only and 8,751 multimodal QA pairs derived from real-world questions about dogs and cats, paired with answers from expert veterinarians. Its test split, PetQA-Bench, further includes annotations for question types and clinical conditions. We evaluate eighteen models using ROUGE, BERTScore, and LLM-as-a-judge metrics for factuality and helpfulness under three settings: zero-shot inference, retrieval-augmented generation (RAG), and supervised fine-tuning (SFT). The benchmarking results provide an overview of the strengths and limitations of current models in addressing veterinary clinical queries and highlight the need for more effective adaptation methods to develop clinically reliable AI systems for veterinary care. To facilitate broader use, we additionally provide translated versions of PetQA-Bench in five languages.

cs.CL↗
arXiv2026

LookBack: Where and How to Score LVLM Responses via Visual Reference Usage

Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs) integrate visual perception with language generation, enabling responses that span image understanding and complex reasoning. However, LVLMs do not just inherit the text-level hallucinations; they also hallucinate against the image, producing fluent responses ungrounded in what they see. This makes LVLM response scoring inherently harder, and our diagnostics show that existing confidence-based metrics adopted from LLMs are insufficient for LVLMs. Specifically, removing the input image barely changes confidence-based selection, suggesting that output-space confidence primarily captures textual plausibility rather than agreement with the image. To address this gap, we propose LookBack, a training-free LVLM response scoring method that augments token likelihood with visual lookback score, a lightweight measure of how strongly each response token refers to image tokens. Across four benchmarks and three models, LookBack consistently improves Best-of-$N$ selection over existing baselines with negligible additional overhead.

cs.CV↗