arXiv Science⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2601.07693

Cluster-based name embeddings reduce ethnic disparities in record linkage quality under realistic name corruption: evidence from the North Carolina Voter Registry

Joseph Lam·Mario Cortina-Borja·Rob Aldridge·Ruth Blackburn·Katie Harron
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Differential ethnic-based record linkage errors can bias epidemiologic estimates. Prior evidence often conflates heterogeneity in error mechanisms with unequal exposure to error. Using snapshots of the North Carolina Voter Registry (Oct 2011-Oct 2022), we derived empirical name-discrepancy profiles to parameterise realistic corruptions. From an Oct 2022 extract (n=848,566), we generated five replicate corrupted datasets under three settings that separately varied mechanism heterogeneity and exposure inequality, and linked records back to originals using unadjusted Jaro-Winkler, Term Frequency (TF)-adjusted Jaro-Winkler, and a cluster-based forename-embedding comparator combined with TF-adjusted surname comparison. We evaluated false match rate (FMR), missed match rate (MMR) and white-centric disparities. At a fixed MMR near 0.20, overall error rates and ethnic disparities diverged substantially by model under disproportionate exposure to corruption. Term-frequency (TF)-adjusted Jaro-Winkler achieved very low overall FMR (0.55% (95% CI 0.54-0.57)) at overall MMR 20.34% (20.30-20.39), but large white-centric under-linkage disparities persisted: Hispanic voters had 36.3% (36.1-36.6) and Non-Hispanic Black voters 8.6% (8.6-8.7) higher FMRs compared to Non-Hispanic White groups. Relative to unadjusted string similarity, TF adjustment reduced these disparities (Hispanic: +60.4% (60.1-60.7) to +36.3%; Black: +13.1% (13.0-13.2) to +8.6%). The cluster-based forename-embedding model reduced missed-match disparities further (Hispanic: +10.2% (9.8-10.3); Black: +0.6% (0.4-0.7)), but at a cost of increasing overall FMR (4.28% (4.22-4.35)) at the same threshold. Unequal exposure to identifier error drove substantially larger disparities than mechanism heterogeneity alone; cluster-based embeddings markedly narrowed under-linkage disparities beyond TF adjustment.

Explore related subjects

stat.ME

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Joseph Lam, Mario Cortina-Borja, Rob Aldridge, Ruth Blackburn, Katie Harron. 2026-01-12. Cluster-based name embeddings reduce ethnic disparities in record linkage quality under realistic name corruption: evidence from the North Carolina Voter Registry. https://arxiv.org/abs/2601.07693

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Surprise Reduction and Nullification in Bayesian and Inverse Bayesian Inference under Ambiguous Prediction-Error Attribution

In non-stationary environments, prediction errors may signal environmental change or transient outliers, and adaptive systems must track such changes without overreacting to outliers. We distinguish surprise reduction, which updates beliefs to fit observations, from surprise nullification, which weakens constraints imposed by the predictive structure, and formalize both within Bayesian and inverse Bayesian (BIB) inference. Belief and likelihood updates are derived from variational objectives sharing a nullification strength, determined endogenously by minimizing surprise under the candidate post-update predictive distribution. In the Gaussian case, nullification expands belief and likelihood variances by a common factor relative to standard Bayesian updating, leaving the ratio unchanged. BIB thus defers attribution of the prediction error, committing to neither latent-state change nor observation-process uncertainty. The nullification strength is carried over as a candidate and is maintained or released according to the predictive surprise of the next observation. In a mean estimation task with outliers and changepoints, no scanned parameter setting of a Sage-Husa-type adaptive Kalman filter, fixed-strength BIB variant, or belief-forgetting-only variant outperforms BIB in both changepoint tracking and post-outlier stability. An oracle-informed reduced Bayesian model tracks changepoints better but is less stable after outliers. Although BIB maintains no explicit hypotheses about changepoints or outliers, it generates event-dependent dynamics. The learning rate increases after changepoints, whereas after outliers, nullification is released, and this increase is suppressed. Deferring attribution and letting subsequent observations differentiate the responses may constitute a principle of adaptive inference in non-stationary environments.

stat.ME↗
arXiv2026

Generalized Ridge Refitting for the Lasso and Prediction Improvement Bounds

We study a class of Lasso based estimators obtained by applying a quadratic correction on the Lasso equicorrelation set. The penalty matrix determines both the magnitude and geometry of the correction and contains, among other cases, the isotropic Lasso--Ridge correction, least squares refitting, Gram proportional interpolation between the Lasso and least squares, and coordinate specific penalties. We first derive a closed form representation and isolate the positive gain component of the resulting prediction improvement. We then control the remaining stochastic linear term in expectation by localizing the random signed equicorrelation model around a deterministic reference support. This yields a finite sample expectation bound that explicitly accounts for the randomness induced by Lasso model selection. The resulting decomposition provides a unified framework for understanding when Lasso based quadratic corrections can improve prediction.

stat.ME↗
arXiv2026

Discretization in covariate-adaptive randomization: gains and losses

Covariate-adaptive randomization(CAR) is widely implemented in clinical trials to balance prognostic covariates across treatment arms. Continuous covariates are often discretized into strata in practice, yet their consequences are not clearly understood. This paper provides a comprehensive study of the impact of discretization on both the CAR design process and the inferential results thereafter. We establish the asymptotic properties of both imbalance measures and treatment effect estimators under discretized and non-discretized settings. Practical recommendations are given on when and how discretization should be employed. We show that discretization in design is generally recommended, as it enhances robustness against model misspecification. However, if the true model is known, the most efficient strategy is to balance covariates according to that model in the design. The theoretical results are corroborated by extensive simulation studies and an empirical application to a diabetes trial dataset. Together, the results clarify the gains and losses of discretization in CAR and pave the way for learning impact of discretization to other designs and beyond.

stat.ME↗