arXiv ScienceSearch

arXiv · 2601.07566

Dynamic $(\Delta + 1)$ Vertex Coloring

Abstract

Several recent results from dynamic and sublinear graph coloring are surveyed. This problem is widely studied and has motivating applications like network topology control, constraint satisfaction, and real-time resource scheduling. Graph coloring algorithms are called colorers. In \S 1 are defined graph coloring, the dynamic model, and the notion of performance of graph algorithms in the dynamic model. In particular $(\Delta + 1)$-coloring, sublinear performance, and oblivious and adaptive adversaries are noted and motivated. In \S 2 the pair of approximately optimal dynamic vertex colorers given in arXiv:1708.09080 are summarized as a warmup for the $(\Delta + 1)$-colorers. In \S 3 the state of the art in dynamic $(\Delta + 1)$-coloring is presented. This section comprises a pair of papers (arXiv:1711.04355 and arXiv:1910.02063) that improve dynamic $(\Delta + 1)$-coloring from the naive algorithm with $O(\Delta)$ expected amortized update time to $O(\log \Delta)$, then to $O(1)$ with high probability. In \S 4 the results in arXiv:2411.04418, which gives a sublinear algorithm for $(\Delta + 1)$-coloring that generalizes oblivious adversaries to adaptive adversaries, are presented.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Noam Benson-Tilsen. 2026-01-12. Dynamic $(\Delta + 1)$ Vertex Coloring. https://arxiv.org/abs/2601.07566

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS