arXiv Science⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2601.07283

The Non-Orientable Topology of Condorcet's Paradox

Ori Livson·Siddharth Pritam·Mikhail Prokopenko
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Preference cycles are prevalent in problems of decision-making, and are contradictory when preferences are assumed to be transitive. This contradiction underlies Condorcet's Paradox, a pioneering result of social choice theory, wherein intuitive and seemingly desirable constraints on decision-making necessarily lead to contradictory preference cycles. Topological methods have since broadened social choice theory and elucidated existing results. However, characterisations of preference cycles in topological social choice theory are lacking. In this paper, we address this gap by introducing a framework for topologically modelling preference cycles that generalises Baryshnikov's existing topological model of strict, ordinal preferences on 3 alternatives. In our framework, the contradiction underlying Condorcet's Paradox topologically corresponds to the non-orientability of a surface homeomorphic to either the Klein bottle or real projective plane, depending on how preference cycles are represented. These findings allow us to reformulate Arrow's Impossibility Theorem in terms of the orientability of a surface as well.

Explore related subjects

math.ATcs.GTecon.TH

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Ori Livson, Siddharth Pritam, Mikhail Prokopenko. 2026-09-04. The Non-Orientable Topology of Condorcet's Paradox. https://arxiv.org/abs/2601.07283

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

Discover connections

cs.GT subjectecon.TH subjectmath.AT subject

Connections use source metadata and explicit phrase matches, not verified experimental comparisons.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

The Endogeneity of Miscalibration: Impossibility and Escape in Scored Reporting

An agent's probability report is paid for twice: by a strictly proper scoring rule, and by an approval rule for the decision it triggers. In this classical decision-coupled setting, non-affine approval is known to defeat truthful reporting. We show the conflict is endogenous: when feasible, the welfare-maximizing approval rule is never affine. The distortion, however, is predictable and can be designed around. There is a reserve report at which pretending to be the marginal type costs exactly the approval prize. Approving at or above the reserve screens types perfectly under every strictly proper score, and the reserve does not depend on the type distribution. A Lipschitz rule with a single kink attains first-best exactly; under strict feasibility no continuously differentiable rule does. The binding constraint is steepness, not smoothness. First-best is attainable within a slope budget if and only if the budget is at least the critical slope: the steepest chord of the pretending cost up to the reserve. Below it the welfare loss is cubic in the shortfall. Where the pretending cost is convex up to the reserve, as for Brier, log and power scores, the critical slope is closed-form. The instances are AI-agent oversight and marketplace operation.

cs.GT↗
arXiv2026

Near-Optimal Mechanisms for Resource Allocation Without Monetary Transfers

We study the problem in which a central planner sequentially allocates a single resource to multiple strategic agents using their utility reports at each round, but without using any monetary transfers. We consider general agent utility distributions and two standard settings: a finite horizon $T$ and an infinite horizon with $γ$ discounts. We provide general tools to characterize the convergence rate between the optimal mechanism for the central planner and the first-best allocation if true agent utilities were available. This heavily depends on the utility distributions, yielding rates anywhere between $1/\sqrt T$ and $1/T$ for the finite-horizon setting, and rates faster than $\sqrt{1-γ}$, including exponential rates for the infinite-horizon setting as agents are more patient $γ\to 1$. On the algorithmic side, we design mechanisms based on the promised-utility framework to achieve these rates and leverage structure on the utility distributions. Intuitively, the more flexibility the central planner has to reward or penalize any agent while incurring little social welfare cost, the faster the convergence rate. In particular, discrete utility distributions typically yield the slower rates $1/\sqrt T$ and $\sqrt{1-γ}$, while smooth distributions with density typically yield faster rates $1/T$ (up to logarithmic factors) and $1-γ$.

cs.GT↗
arXiv2026

A 1.283 Price-of-Anarchy Bound for the Repeated Virtual First-Price Auction

We study the repeated allocation of a single indivisible resource among $n$ strategic players. Each player $i$ has a privately known value distribution $D_i$, and values are drawn independently across players and periods. The goal is to find fair and efficient mechanisms. We apply the repeated first-price auction with equal initial endowments of virtual money. We show that each player can asymptotically secure the same fair-floor guarantee $f(D_i)$ as in Csóka 2026; consequently, the mechanism is $1.283$-optimal. This provides a simpler and more robust alternative mechanism for this special case and may also help derive sharper upper bounds on the price of anarchy.

cs.GT↗