Asymmetric Laplace distribution regression model for fitting heterogeneous longitudinal response

Antoine Barbieri; Angelo Alcaraz; Mouna Abed; Hugues de Courson; Hélène Jacqmin-Gadda

Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2512.12362

Asymmetric Laplace distribution regression model for fitting heterogeneous longitudinal response

Antoine Barbieri·Angelo Alcaraz·Mouna Abed·Hugues de Courson·Hélène Jacqmin-Gadda

View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

The systematic collection of longitudinal data is very common in practice, making mixed models widely used. Most developments around these models focus on modeling the mean trajectory of repeated measurements, typically under the assumption of homoskedasticity. However, as data become increasingly rich through intensive collection over time, these models can become limiting and may introduce biases in analysis. In fact, such data are often heterogeneous, with the presence of outliers, heteroskedasticity, and asymmetry in the distribution of individual measurements. Therefore, ignoring these characteristics can lead to biased modeling results. In this work, we propose a mixed-effect distributional regression model based on the asymmetric Laplace distribution to: (1) address the presence of outliers, heteroskedasticity, and asymmetry in longitudinal measurements; (2) model the entire individual distribution of the heterogeneous longitudinal response over time, rather than just its conditional expectation; and (3) give a more comprehensive evaluation of the impact of covariates on the distribution of the responses through meaningful indicator. A Bayesian estimation procedure is presented. In order to choose between two distributional regression models, we also propose a new model selection criterion for longitudinal data. It measures the proximity between the individual distribution estimated by the model and the empirical individual distribution of the data over time, using a set of quantiles. The estimation procedure and the selection criterion are validated in a simulation study and the proposed model is compared to a distributional regression mixed model based on the Gaussian distribution and a location-scale linear quantile mixed model. Finally, the proposed model is applied to analyze blood pressure over time for hospitalized patients in the intensive care unit.

Explore related subjects

stat.ME

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeX RIS

Antoine Barbieri, Angelo Alcaraz, Mouna Abed, Hugues de Courson, Hélène Jacqmin-Gadda. 2025-12-13. Asymmetric Laplace distribution regression model for fitting heterogeneous longitudinal response. https://arxiv.org/abs/2512.12362

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Bias-Correction for Privacy-Protected Spatial Autoregressive Models with Application to Restaurant Network Analysis

Spatial autoregressive (SAR) models and their extensions are important tools for studying network effects. However, with an increasing emphasis on data privacy, data providers often implement protection measures that render standard SAR models inapplicable. In this study, we introduce a privacy-protected SAR model that incorporates noise into both the response and covariates to meet privacy requirements. With noise present in both components, the traditional quasi-maximum likelihood estimator becomes difficult to compute because the likelihood function cannot be directly formulated. To bypass this hurdle, we begin with a pseudo-likelihood approach, initially omitting the noise in the covariates. A Newton-Raphson algorithm is then applied to compute the estimator; however, the estimator is biased. To address this, we propose a bias-corrected Newton-Raphson-type algorithm that simultaneously accounts for noise in both the response and covariates. We further show, under appropriate regularity conditions, that the resulting estimator is consistent and asymptotically normal. To further enhance computational efficiency, we also develop a bias-corrected least squares estimator. Several extensions are discussed, and the finite-sample performance of the proposed methods is evaluated through extensive simulations. We apply the proposed methodology to restaurant transaction data from a third-party payment platform. Our method identifies a statistically significant competitive network effect among restaurants and further reveals meaningful restaurant-customer interaction patterns.

stat.ME↗

arXiv2026

A variational framework for modal estimation

Multivariate mode estimation arises in many statistical problems such as inverse problems, multimodal sampling, and density-based clustering, but becomes challenging in moderate to high dimensions, especially when the underlying density is not directly evaluable. We introduce GERVE (Gibbs-measure Entropy-Regularized Variational Estimation), a sample-based method for estimating multivariate modes by approximating Gibbs distributions directly from samples, without estimating or evaluating the density. GERVE uses Gaussian-mixture variational annealing and natural-gradient optimization, producing a mixture concentrated in high-density regions whose component responsibilities also provide a clustering of the observations. We prove theoretical guarantees in two regimes: as the Gibbs temperature goes to zero, the optimal variational mixture concentrates around the global modes of the population density; at fixed positive temperature, we prove existence, consistency, and asymptotic normality of empirical maximizers and propose a bootstrap procedure for uncertainty quantification. Simulations and a real-data experiment show that GERVE accurately recovers modes and produces meaningful clusters.

stat.ME↗

arXiv2026

Objective Model Prior Probabilities in Variable Selection

For many years it was routine to use equal model prior probabilities in Bayesian model uncertainty analysis. At least twenty years ago it became clear that this was problematic, leading to support of much too large models in the increasingly huge model spaces being considered in genomics and other fields. A popular replacement was to adopt a suggestion of Harold Jeffreys for the variable selection problem in which a total of $k$ possible variables are being considered for inclusion in the model: give the collection of all models containing $d$ variables ($d = 0, . . . , k$) prior probability $1/(k + 1)$ and then divide this prior probability equally among the models in the collection. Many other choices of model prior probabilities that impose severe parsimony have also been introduced. We begin by reviewing the problems with using equal model prior probabilities and then discuss some serious problems with the Jeffreys choice. Finally, we introduce and study a number of objective alternative choices of model prior probabilities, from both numerical and theoretical perspectives.

stat.ME↗