arXiv ScienceSearch

arXiv · 2512.00657

Computational Paths Form a Weak ω-Groupoid

Abstract

Lumsdaine (2010) and van den Berg-Garner (2011) proved that types in Martin-Löf type theory carry the structure of weak ω-groupoids. Their proofs, while foundational, rely on abstract properties of the identity type without providing explicit computational content for coherence witnesses. We establish an analogous result for computational paths -- an alternative formulation of equality where witnesses are explicit sequences of rewrites from the LNDEQ-TRS term rewriting system. Our main result is that computational paths on any type form a weak ω-groupoid with fully explicit coherence data. The groupoid operations -- identity, composition, and inverse -- are defined at every dimension, and the coherence laws (associativity, unit laws, inverse laws) are witnessed by concrete rewrite derivations rather than abstract existence proofs. The construction provides: (i) a proper tower of n-cells for all dimensions, with 2-cells as derivations between paths and higher cells mediating between lower-dimensional witnesses; (ii) explicit pentagon and triangle coherences built from the rewrite rules; and (iii) contractibility at dimensions $\geq 3$, ensuring all parallel higher cells are connected. The contractibility property is derived from the normalization algorithm of the rewrite system, grounding the higher-dimensional structure in concrete computational content. The entire construction has been formalized in Lean 4, providing machine-checked verification of the weak ω-groupoid structure.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Arthur F. Ramos, Tiago M. L. de Veras, Ruy J. G. B. de Queiroz, Anjolina G. de Oliveira. 2025-11-29. Computational Paths Form a Weak ω-Groupoid. https://arxiv.org/abs/2512.00657

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

A Probabilistic Choreography Language for PRISM

We present a choreographic framework for modelling and analysing concurrent probabilistic systems based on the PRISM model-checker. This is achieved through the development of a choreography language, which is a specification language that allows to describe the desired interactions within a concurrent system from a global viewpoint. Using choreographies gives a clear and complete view of system interactions, making it easier to understand the process flow and identify potential errors, which helps ensure correct execution and improves system reliability. We equip our language with a probabilistic semantics and then define a formal encoding into the PRISM language and discuss its correctness. Properties of programs written in our choreographic language can be model-checked by the PRISM model-checker via their translation into the PRISM language. Finally, we implement a compiler for our language and demonstrate its practical applicability via examples drawn from the use cases featured in the PRISM website.

cs.LO

Monotone weak distributive laws over the lifted powerset monad in categories of algebras

Noticing the similarity between the monotone weak distributive laws combining two layers of nondeterminism in sets and in compact Hausdorff spaces, we study whether the latter law can be obtained automatically as a weak lifting of the former. This holds partially, but does not generalize to other categories of algebras: we then characterize when exactly monotone weak distributive laws over powerset monads in categories of algebras exist, exhibiting a law combining probabilities and non-determinism in compact Hausdorff spaces and showing on the other hand that such laws do not exist in a lot of other cases.

cs.LO

Identifying and Explaining (Non-)Equivalence of First-Order Logic Formulas

First-order logic is the basis for many knowledge representation formalisms and methods. Providing technological support for learning to write first-order formulas for natural language specifications requires methods to test formulas for (non-)equivalence and to provide explanations for non-equivalence. We propose such methods based on both theoretical insights and existing tools, implement them, and report on experiments testing their effectiveness on a large educational data set with > 100,000 pairs of first-order formulas.

cs.LO