arXiv ScienceSearch

arXiv · 2511.21164

Preference-Aligned Options from Generative AI Compensates for Age-Related Cognitive Decline in Decision Making

Abstract

Older adults often experience increased difficulty in decision making due to age-related declines particularly in contexts that require information search or the generation of alternatives from memory. This study examined whether using generative AI for information search enhances choice satisfaction and reduces choice difficulty among older adults. A total of 130 participants (younger, n = 56; older, n = 74) completed a music-selection task under AI-use and AI-nonuse conditions across two contexts: previously experienced (road trip) and not previously experienced (space travel). In the AI-nonuse condition, participants generated candidate options from memory; in the AI-use condition, GPT-4o presented options tailored to individual preferences. Cognitive functions, including working memory, processing speed, verbal comprehension, and perceptual reasoning, were assessed. Results showed that AI use significantly reduced perceived choice difficulty across age groups, with larger benefits in unfamiliar contexts. Regarding cognitive function, among older adults, lower cognitive function was associated with fewer recalled options, higher choice difficulty, and lower satisfaction in the AI-nonuse condition; these associations were substantially attenuated when AI was used. These results demonstrate that generative AI can mitigate age-related cognitive constraints by reducing the cognitive load associated with information search during decision making. While the use of AI reduced perceived difficulty, choice satisfaction remained unchanged, suggesting that autonomy in decision making was preserved. These findings indicate that generative AI can support everyday decision making by compensating for the constraints in information search that older adults face due to cognitive decline.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Sayaka Ishibashi, Kou Tamura, Ayana Goma, Kenta Yamamoto, Kouhei Masumoto. 2025-12-04. Preference-Aligned Options from Generative AI Compensates for Age-Related Cognitive Decline in Decision Making. https://arxiv.org/abs/2511.21164

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Are explainable AI (XAI) evaluation strategies aligned? Comparing subjective, objective, and mathematical evaluation measures using saliency maps

The evaluation of explainable AI (XAI) approaches often relies on three families of methods: subjective measures (e.g., questionnaires on trust or satisfaction), objective measures (e.g., task performance metrics), and mathematical metrics (e.g., for faithfulness). Yet, it remains unclear how these families align or diverge in practice. In a{preregistered} between-subjects study (N=166), we use three established saliency map techniques (LIME, Grad-CAM, Guided Backpropagation) as a testbed to examine this issue. We find that each family of methods leads to different conclusions: participants reported no differences in trust or satisfaction, Grad-CAM improved user performance, while mathematical metrics favored Guided Backpropagation. At the same time, mathematical metrics were only partially related to user performance, and these relationships were sometimes counterintuitive. Our findings highlight the methodological importance of comparing subjective, objective, and mathematical approaches when evaluating XAI, illustrating both tensions and aspects that are aligned. We discuss implications for XAI evaluation frameworks.

cs.HC

Mind Your Ps and Qs: Positive Moderation Practice in the Positive Queue

Online communities rely on volunteer moderators to maintain order. Despite their key role, moderators are given a toolbox of punishments and far less support for encouraging contributions they want to see more of. We introduce the Positive Queue as a positive counterpart to Reddit's modqueue: a dedicated space for moderators to discover contributions and behaviors they want to encourage and positively reinforce. With five moderators, four with 6-14 years of experience, we use the Positive Queue to examine how moderators operationalize positive reinforcement. Moderators combined predicted community reception, observed engagement, and their own judgment; used prediction-engagement mismatches to identify overlooked content; and repurposed positive features for punitive and retrospective work. These findings surface tensions around labor, attribution, and community fit. We contribute the Positive Queue as a working system and conceptualize positive moderation as recognition infrastructure that shapes what moderators notice, whose judgment becomes visible, and how recognition reaches contributors.

cs.HC

PILOT: Control Surfaces for Authoring Social Media Feeds

Personalized social media feeds infer preferences from behavior, leaving people little direct control over what they see. Existing controls range from post-level reactions to rules and natural language, but little is known about how people use them together or how added expressiveness changes effort. We built PILOT, a Bluesky feed-authoring system that turns in-feed actions into explicit preferences, deterministic ranking, and inspectable outcomes. A study with seven participants informed an expanded implementation, which we organized into three nested control surfaces that ten participants compared within subjects. Participants assigned controls to distinct jobs: broad controls set direction, in-post actions refined results, and filters removed content. Richer surfaces did not necessarily feel more effortful, and participants' experiences depended more on whether they could verify and repair outcomes. Our findings show that usable feed control requires not simply more controls, but orchestration across mechanisms that support expression, inspection, repair, and episodic use.

cs.HC